|
ABSTRACT
Current zero-knowledge watermark detectors are based on a linear correlation between the asset features and a given secret sequence.This detection function is susceptible of being attacked by sensitivity attacks,for which zero-knowledge does not provide protection.In this paper a new zero-knowledge watermark detector robust to sensitivity attacks is presented,using the Generalized Gaussian Maximum Likelihood (ML)detector as basis.The inherent robustness that this detector presents against sensitivity attacks,together with the security provided by the zero-knowledge protocol that conceals the keys that could be used to remove the watermark or to produce forged assets,results in a robust and secure protocol.Additionally,two new zero-knowledge proofs for modulus and square root calculation are presented;they serve as building blocks for the zero-knowledge implementation of the Generalized Gaussian ML detector,and also open new possibilities in the design of high level protocols.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
A. Adelsbach, S. Katzenbeisser, and A.-R. Sadeghi. Watermark detection with zero-knowledge disclosure. In Multimedia Systems volume 9, pages 266--278. Spriger-Verlag, 2003.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
A. Adelsbach, M. Rohe, and A.-R. Sadeghi. Non-interactive watermark detection for a correlation-based watermarking scheme. In Communications and Multimedia Security: 9th IFIP TC-6 TC-11International Conference, CMS 2005 volume 3677 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science pages 129--139. Spriger-Verlag, September 2005.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
M. Barni and F. Bartolini. Watermarking Systems Engineering Signal Processing and Communications. Marcel Dekker, 2004.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
F. Boudot. Efficient proofs that a committed number lies in an interval. In EUROCRYPT 2000 volume 1807 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science pages 431--444. Spriger-Verlag, 2000.
|
| |
9
|
B. Chen and G. Wornell. Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 47:1423--1443, May 2001.
|
| |
10
|
P. Comesaña, L. Pérez-Freire, and F. Pérez-González. The blind newton sensitivity attack. In E.J.D. III and P.W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VIII Proc. of SPIE, San José, USA, January 2006.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
J.R. Hernández, M. Amado, and F. Pérez-González. Dct-domain watermarking techniques for still images: Detector performance analysis and a new structure. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9(1):55--68, January 2000. Special Issue on Image and Video Processing for Digital Libraries.
|
| |
18
|
H. Lipmaa. On diophantine complexity and statistical zero-knowledge arguments. In ASIACRYPT 2003 volume 2894 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science pages 398--415. Spriger-Verlag, November 2003.
|
| |
19
|
L. Pérez-Freire, P. Comesaña, and F. Pérez-González. Detection in quantization-based watermarking: performance and security issues. In E.J.D. III and P.W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VII volume 5681 of Proc. of SPIE pages 721--733, San José, USA, January 2005.
|
| |
20
|
F. Pérez-González, F. Balado, and J.R. Hernández. Performance analysis of existing and new methods for data hiding with known-host information in additive channels. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 51:960--980, April 2003.
|
| |
21
|
A. Piva, V. Cappellini, D. Corazzi, A.D. Rosa, C. Orlandi, and M. Barni. Zero-knowledge st-dm watermarking. In E.J.D. III and P.W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VIII, SPIE SanJosé, California, USA, January 2006.
|
|