ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of scheduling in wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (334 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Los Angeles, CA, USA
SESSION: Wireless fundamentals table of contents
Pages: 227 - 238  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-286-0
Authors
Gaurav Sharma  Purdue University
Ravi R. Mazumdar  University of Waterloo
Ness B. Shroff  Purdue University
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 199,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1161089.1161116
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of throughput-optimal scheduling in wireless networks subject to interference constraints. We model the interference using a family of K -hop interference models. We define a K-hop interference model as one for which no two links within K hops can successfully transmit at the same time (Note that IEEE 802.11 DCF corresponds to a 2-hop interference model.) .For a given K, a throughput-optimal scheduler needs to solve a maximum weighted matching problem subject to the K-hop interference constraints. For K=1, the resulting problem is the classical Maximum Weighted Matching problem, that can be solved in polynomial time. However, we show that for K>1,the resulting problems are NP-Hard and cannot be approximated within a factor that grows polynomially with the number of nodes. Interestingly, we show that for specific kinds of graphs, that can be used to model the underlying connectivity graph of a wide range of wireless networks, the resulting problems admit polynomial time approximation schemes. We also show that a simple greedy matching algorithm provides a constant factor approximation to the scheduling problem for all K in this case. We then show that under a setting with single-hop traffic and no rate control, the maximal scheduling policy considered in recent related works can achieve a constant fraction of the capacity region for networks whose connectivity graph can be represented using one of the above classes of graphs. These results are encouraging as they suggest that one can develop distributed algorithms to achieve near optimal throughput in case of a wide range of wireless networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
D. J. Baker, J. Wieselthier, and A. Ephremides. A Distributed Algorithm for Scheduling the Activation of Links in a Self-organizing Mobile Radio Network. In IEEE ICC pages 2F.6.1--2F.6.5, 1982.
3
 
4
L. Bui, A. Eryilmaz, R. Srikant, and X. Wu. Joint Asynchronous Congestion Control and Distributed Scheduling for Multi-Hop Wireless Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2006.
 
5
P. Chaporkar, K. Kar, and S. Sarkar. Throughput Guarantees Through Maximal Scheduling in Wireless Networks. 43rd Annual Allerton Conf. on Communications, Control, and Computing, Sep 2005.
 
6
M. V. Clark, K. K. Leung, B. McNair, and Z. Kostic. Outdoor IEEE 802.11 cellular networks: Radio link performance. In IEEE ICC April 2002.
 
7
R. L. Cruz and A. V. Santhanam. Optimal routing, link scheduling and power control in multihop wireless networks. In INFOCOM 2003.
 
8
 
9
J. Gill. Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Turi ng Machines. SIAM Journal on Computing 6(4):675--695, 1977.
 
10
H. Balakrishnan et al. The Distance-2 Matching Problem and its Relationship to the MAC-layer Capacity of Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. IEEE JSAC 22(6):1069--1079, Aug 2004.
 
11
B. Hajek and G. Sasaki. Link Scheduling in Polynomial Time. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 34(5):910--917,Sep 1988.
 
12
M. M. Halldorsson. Approximations of Weighted Independent Set and Hereditary Subset Problems. Journal of Graphs Algorithms and Applications 4(1):1--16, 2000.
 
13
J. Hastad. Clique is Hard to Approximate within n1ε. Acta Mathematica 182:105--142, 1999.
14
 
15
 
16
F. Kelly, A. Maulloo, and D. Tan. Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. In Journalof the Oper. Res. Society volume 49, pages 237--252, 1998.
 
17
18
 
19
X. Lin and N. B. Shroff. The Impact of Imperfect Scheduling on Cross-Layer Rate Control in Multihop Wireless Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM Mar 2005.
 
20
 
21
M. J. Neely, E. Modiano, and C. Li. Fairness and optimal stochastic control for heterogeneous networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2005.
 
22
M. J. Neely, E. Modiano, and C. E. Rohrs. Dynamic Power Allocation and Routing for Time Varying Wireless Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
 
23
 
24
S. Sarkar and L. Tassiulas. End-to-end bandwidth guarantees through fair local spectrum share in wireless ad-hoc networks. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 50(9), Sep 2005.
 
25
G. Sharma, R. R. Mazumdar, and N. B. Shroff. Maximum Weighted Matching with Interference Constraints. In IEEE FAWN March 2006.
 
26
 
27
L. Stockmeyer and V. Vazirani. NP-completeness of some generalizations of the maximum matching problem. Inform. Process. Lett. 15(1):14--19, 1982.
 
28
 
29
L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides. Jointly optimal routing and scheduling in packet radio networks. IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory 38(1):165--168, Jan 1992.
 
30
L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides. Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 37(12):1936--1948, December 1992.
 
31
 
32
X. Wu and R. Srikant. Regulated maximal matching: A distributed scheduling algorithm for multi-hop wireless networks with node exclusive spectrum sharing. In IEEE CDC 2005.
 
33
X. Wu and R. Srikant. Bounds on the Capacity Region of Multi-hop Wireless Networks under Distributed Greedy Scheduling. In IEEE INFOCOM 2006.
 
34
L. Xiao, M. Johansson, and S. Boyd. Simultaneous routing and resource allocation via dual decomposition. IEEE Trans. on Comm. 52(7):1136--1144, July 2004.
 
35
 
36
Y. Yi and S. Shakkottai. Hop-by-hop Congestion Control over a Wireless Multi-hop Network. In IEEE INFOCOM March 2004.

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gaurav Sharma: colleagues
Ravi R. Mazumdar: colleagues
Ness B. Shroff: colleagues