ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Packet-level diversity - from theory to practice: an 802.11-based experimental investigation
Full text PdfPdf (352 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Los Angeles, CA, USA
SESSION: Measurements table of contents
Pages: 62 - 73  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-286-0
Authors
Evangelos Vergetis  University of Pennsylvania
Eric Pierce  University of Pennsylvania
Marc Blanco  University of Pennsylvania
Roch Guérin  University of Pennsylvania
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1161089.1161098
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Packet-level diversity, or distributing packet transmissions over multiple, diverse channels, offers benefits in improving communication performance and robustness to channel variations. Previous works have analyzed and quantified those benefits, and developed transmission policies to realize them. However, translating those benefits into practice still faces numerous challenges from uncertainty in the adequacy of the channel models used to develop policies, to implementation dificulties in realizing the precise transmission schedules they mandate. This work is a first step in assessing what remains of those benefits once confronted with such practical challenges. Our investigation is carried out over an 802.11 testbed, where diversity is realized through the different frequency bands available for transmissions between hosts and access points. We use the testbed to evaluate the impact of transmission policies, channel characteristics, channel correlation, and various end-system constraints that affect our ability to precisely control transmissions timing. Our investigation reveals that in spite of the many gaps that exist between theory and practice, packet-level diversity still provides a simple solution to improve transmission performance and robustness across a broad range of configurations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Abdouni, W. Cheng, A. L. Chow, L. Golubchik, W. -J. Lee, and J. C. Lui. Multi-pathstreaming: Optimization and evaluation. In Proc. of MMCN '05, San Jose, CA,January 2005.
2
 
3
E. Ayano. glu, C. -L. I, R. Gitlin, and J. Mazo. Diversity coding for transparent self-healing and fault-tolerant communication networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(11), November 1993.
 
4
E. Biersack. Performance evaluation of forward error correction in an ATM environment. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 11(4):631--640, May 1993.
 
5
R. Chandra, P. Bahl, and P. Bahl. MultiNet: Connecting to multiple IEEE 802.11 networks using a single wireless card. In Proc. of INFOCOM '04, Hong Kong, China, March 2004.
 
6
S. Diggavi, N. Al-Dhahir, A. Stamoulis, and A. Calderbank. Great expectations: The value of spatial diversity in wireless networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(2), February 2004.
7
 
8
 
9
F. Herzel, G. Fischer, and H. Gustat. An integrated CMOS RF synthesizer for 802.11a wireless LAN. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 38(10), October 2003.
 
10
R. Karrer, A. Sabharwal, and E. Knightly. Enabling large-scale wireless broadband: The case for TAPs. In Proc. of HotNets '03, Cambridge, MA, November 2003.
 
11
H. Lundgren, D. Lundberg, J. Nielsen, E. Nordström, and C. Tschudin. A large-scale testbed for reproducible ad hoc protocol evaluations. In Proc. of WCNC '02, Orlando, FL, March 2002.
12
13
 
14
D. Raychaudhri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh. Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In Proc. of WCNC '05, New Orleans, LA, March 2005.
 
15
J. Robinson, K. Papagiannaki, C. Diot, X. Guo, and L. Krishnamurthy. Experimenting with a multi-radio mesh networking testbed. In Proc. of the 1st WiNMee '05, Trentino, Italy, April 2005.
 
16
N. Shacham and P. McKenney. Packet recovery in high-speed networks using coding and buffer management. In Proc. INFOCOM '90, San Francisco, CA, April 1990.
 
17
A. Tsirigos and Z. Haas. Analysis of multipath routing-Part I:The effect on the packet delivery ratio. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(1),January 2004.
18
 
19
E. Vergetis, R. Guérin, and S. Sarkar. Improving performance through channel diversity in the presence of bursty losses. In Proc. of the 19th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC), Beijing, China, August/September 2005.
20
 
21
B. White, J. Lepreau, and S. Guruprasad. Lowering the barrier to wireless and mobile experimentation. In Proc. of HotNets-I, Princeton, NJ, October 2002.
 
22
A. Willig, M. Kubisch, C. Hoene, and A. Wolisz. Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using an IEEE 802.11-compliant physical layer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49(6), December 2002.
23
 
24
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Evangelos Vergetis: colleagues
Eric Pierce: colleagues
Marc Blanco: colleagues
Roch Guérin: colleagues