ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Implications of link range and (In)stability on sensor network architecture
Full text PdfPdf (1.01 MB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation & characterization table of contents
Los Angeles, CA, USA
SESSION: Characterization studies table of contents
Pages: 65 - 72  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-540-0
Authors
Bhaskaran Raman  IIT Kanpur
Kameswari Chebrolu  IIT Kanpur
Naveen Madabhushi  IIT Kanpur
Dattatraya Y. Gokhale  IIT Kanpur
Phani K. Valiveti  IIT Kanpur
Dheeraj Jain  IIT Kanpur
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160987.1161000
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this work, we consider sensor networks used for scientific instrumentation, where we have a set of nodes collecting data and relaying the same to a central base node. From the point of view of deploying such networks,we re-look at the design choices available for the network architecture and protocol design. A design choice which has not received in-depth attention thus far is the use of external antennas for improving the communication range. We present extensive measurements to quantify the use of external antennas. We show that this is a simple yet effective mechanism, in many cases allowing the use of just a single-hop network architecture. Such an approach of course, also greatly simplifies protocol design. Related to the range studies, we also look at the time variability of RSSI and the packet error rate. We find variability at time scales as small as a single packet and also at several hours. Given this, we argue that dynamic metric based routing becomes highly questionable, and a centralized protocol design becomes a serious alternative.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Hyperlink Technologies: HG2417P-090. http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/hg2417p 090.php.
 
2
Hyperlink Technologies: HG2424G. http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/hg2424g.php.
 
3
Hyperlink Technologies: HGV-2409U. http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/hgv-2409u.php.
 
4
Tmote sky. http://www.moteiv.com/products-tmotesky.php.
 
5
H. Haridas. BriMon: Design and Implementation of Railway Bridge Monitoring Application. Master's thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, May 2006.
6
7
8
 
9
K. Srinivasan and P. Levis. RSSI is Under Appreciated. In EmNets, May 2006.
10
11
 
12
13
14


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bhaskaran Raman: colleagues
Kameswari Chebrolu: colleagues
Naveen Madabhushi: colleagues
Dattatraya Y. Gokhale: colleagues
Phani K. Valiveti: colleagues
Dheeraj Jain: colleagues