| No-commitment branch and bound search for distributed constraint optimization |
| Full text |
Pdf
(254 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Autonomous Agents
archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Optimization and constraint processing
table of contents
Pages: 1427 - 1429
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 49, Citation Count: 9
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We present a new polynomial-space algorithm for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization problems (DCOP). The algorithm, called NCBB, is branch and bound search with modifications for efficiency in a multiagent setting. Two main features of the algorithm are: (a) using different agents to search non-intersecting parts of a search space concurrently, and (b) communicating lower bounds on solution cost every time there is a possibility the bounds might change due to changed variable assignments. The first leads to a better utilization of computational resources of multiple participating agents, while the second provides for more efficient pruning of search space.Experimental results show that NCBB has significantly better performance than another polynomial-space algorithm, ADOPT, on random graph coloring problems. Under assumptions of cheap communication it also has comparable performance with DPOP despite using only polynomial memory as opposed to exponential memory for DPOP.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
K. Hirayama and M. Yokoo. Distributed partial constraint satisfaction problem. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pages 222--236, 1997.
|
| |
3
|
E. L. Lawler and D. E. Wood. Branch-and-bound methods: A survey. Operations Research, 14(4):699--719, 1966.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
A. Meisels, E. Kaplansky, I. Razgon, and R. Zivan. Comparing performance of distributed constraints processing algorithms. In Proc. of DCR Workshop, AAMAS, 2002.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. An efficient constraint optimization method for large multiagent systems. In Proc. of the LSMAS Workshop, AAMAS, 2005.
|
CITED BY 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert N. Lass , Joseph B. Kopena , Evan A. Sultanik , Duc N. Nguyen , Christopher P. Dugan , Pragnesh J. Modi , William C. Regli, Coordination of first responders under communication and resource constraints, Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, May 12-16, 2008, Estoril, Portugal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|