ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
No-commitment branch and bound search for distributed constraint optimization
Full text PdfPdf (254 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Optimization and constraint processing table of contents
Pages: 1427 - 1429  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Anton Chechetka  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Katia Sycara  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160900
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a new polynomial-space algorithm for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization problems (DCOP). The algorithm, called NCBB, is branch and bound search with modifications for efficiency in a multiagent setting. Two main features of the algorithm are: (a) using different agents to search non-intersecting parts of a search space concurrently, and (b) communicating lower bounds on solution cost every time there is a possibility the bounds might change due to changed variable assignments. The first leads to a better utilization of computational resources of multiple participating agents, while the second provides for more efficient pruning of search space.Experimental results show that NCBB has significantly better performance than another polynomial-space algorithm, ADOPT, on random graph coloring problems. Under assumptions of cheap communication it also has comparable performance with DPOP despite using only polynomial memory as opposed to exponential memory for DPOP.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
K. Hirayama and M. Yokoo. Distributed partial constraint satisfaction problem. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pages 222--236, 1997.
 
3
E. L. Lawler and D. E. Wood. Branch-and-bound methods: A survey. Operations Research, 14(4):699--719, 1966.
 
4
 
5
 
6
A. Meisels, E. Kaplansky, I. Razgon, and R. Zivan. Comparing performance of distributed constraints processing algorithms. In Proc. of DCR Workshop, AAMAS, 2002.
 
7
 
8
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. An efficient constraint optimization method for large multiagent systems. In Proc. of the LSMAS Workshop, AAMAS, 2005.

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anton Chechetka: colleagues
Katia Sycara: colleagues