ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Nogood based asynchronous distributed optimization (ADOPT ng)
Full text PdfPdf (372 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Optimization and constraint processing table of contents
Pages: 1389 - 1396  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Marius C. Silaghi  Florida Institute of Technology
Makoto Yokoo  Kyushu University
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160894
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work proposes an asynchronous algorithm for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization problems (DCOPs) using a new kind of nogoods, namely valued nogoods. The proposed technique is an extension of the asynchronous distributed optimization (ADOPT) where valued nogoods enable more flexible reasoning, leading to important speed-up. Valued nogoods are an extension of classic nogoods that associates each nogood with a threshold and optionally with a set of references to culprit constraints.DCOPs have been shown to have very elegant distributed solutions, such as ADOPT, distributed asynchronous overlay (DisAO), or DPOP. These algorithms are typically tuned to minimize the longest causal chain of messages, as a measure of how the algorithms will scale for systems with remote agents (with large latency in communication). Among the mentioned techniques, DPOP performs very well for the chosen metric (requiring a number of such sequential messages linear in the number of agents), but in general has exponential space requirements. DisAO and ADOPT have the advantage of needing only polynomial space. ADOPT has the property of maintaining the initial distribution of the problem. ADOPT needs a preprocessing step consisting of computing a depth first search (DFS) tree on the agent graph. We show that valued nogoods reduce the practical importance/need of this preprocessing since independent subproblems are now dynamically detected and exploited.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Z. Collin, R. Dechter, and S. Katz. Self-stabilizing distributed constraint satisfaction. Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 2000.
 
4
J. Davin and P. J. Modi. Impact of problem centralization in distributed cops. In DCR, 2005.
 
5
 
6
M. L. Ginsberg. Dynamic backtracking. Journal of AI Research, 1, 1993.
 
7
K. Hirayama and M. Yokoo. Distributed partial constraint satisfaction problem. In Proceedings of the Conference on Constraint Processing (CP-97), LNCS 1330, pages 222--236, 1997.
 
8
 
9
 
10
P. J. Modi, M. Tambe, W.-M. Shen, and M. Yokoo. A general-purpose asynchronous algorithm for distributed constraint optimization. In Distributed Constraint Reasoning, Proc. of the AAMAS'02 Workshop, Bologna, July 2002. AAMAS.
 
11
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. Approximations in distributed optimization. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming CP 2005, 2005.
 
12
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In IJCAI, 2005.
 
13
M.-C. Silaghi. Asynchronously Solving Distributed Problems with Privacy Requirements. PhD Thesis 2601, (EPFL), June 27, 2002. http://www.cs.fit.edu/~msilaghi/teza.
 
14
 
15
M.-C. Silaghi and B. Faltings. A comparison of DisCSP algorithms with respect to privacy. In AAMAS-DCR, 2002.
 
16
M.-C. Silaghi, J. Landwehr, and J. B. Larrosa. volume 112 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, chapter Asynchronous Branch & Bound and A* for DisWCSPs with heuristic function based on Consistency-Maintenance. IOS Press, 2004.
 
17
 
18
 
19
M.-C. Silaghi, D. Sam-Haroud, and B. Faltings. Hybridizing ABT and AWC into a polynomial space, complete protocol with reordering. Technical Report #01/364, EPFL, May 2001.
 
20
R. M. Stallman and G. J. Sussman. Forward reasoning and dependency-directed backtracking in a system for computer-aided circuit analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 9:135--193, 1977.
 
21
R. Wallace and M.-C. Silaghi. Using privacy loss to guide decisions in distributed CSP search. In FLAIRS'04, 2004.
 
22
M. Yokoo. Constraint relaxation in distributed constraint satisfaction problem. In ICDCS'93, pages 56--63, June 1993.
 
23
M. Yokoo, E. H. Durfee, T. Ishida, and K. Kuwabara. Distributed constraint satisfaction for formalizing distributed problem solving. In ICDCS, pages 614--621, June 1992.
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marius C. Silaghi: colleagues
Makoto Yokoo: colleagues