|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we identify some problems with current formalizations of conditional commitments, i.e. commitments to achieve a goal if some condition becomes true. We present a solution to these problems. We also formalize two types of communicative actions that can be used by an agent to request another agent to achieve a goal or perform an action provided that some condition becomes true. Our account is set within ECASL [9], a framework for modeling communicating agents based on the situation calculus.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Jamal Bentahar , Bernard Moulin , John-Jules Ch. Meyer , Brahim Chaib-draa, A Logical Model for Commitment and Argument Network for Agent Communication, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p.792-799, July 19-23, 2004, New York, New York
[doi> 10.1109/AAMAS.2004.18]
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
P. Cohen and H. Levesque. Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication, pages 221--255. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Foundations for Intelligent Physical Agents. FIPA communicative act library specification, document 37. 1997--2002.
|
| |
6
|
P. Gardenfors. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
S. Khan. A situation calculus account of multiagent planning, speech acts, and communication, MSc Thesis (in preparation), 2005.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
G. Lakemeyer and H. Levesque. AOL: A logic of acting, sensing, knowing, and only-knowing. In Proc. of KR-98, pages 316--327, 1998.
|
| |
11
|
H. Levesque, R. Reiter, Y. Lespérance, F. Lin, and R. Scherl. Golog: A logic programming language for dynamic domains. J. of Logic Programming, 31:59--84, 1997.
|
| |
12
|
J. McCarthy and P. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4:463--502, 1969.
|
| |
13
|
R. Moore. A formal theory of knowledge and action. Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, pages 319--358, 1985.
|
| |
14
|
G. Plotkin. A structural approach to operational semantics. Technical Report DAIMI-FN-19, Computer Science Dept., Aarhus University, Denmark, 1981.
|
| |
15
|
A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In R. Fikes and E. Sandewall, editors, Proc. of KR&R-91, pages 473--484, 1991.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
D. Sadek. Communication theory = rationality principles + communicative act models. In Proc. of AAAI-94 Workshop on Planning for Interagent Comm., 1994.
|
| |
19
|
D. Sadek and P. Bretier. ARTIMIS: Natural dialogue meets rational agency. In Proc. of IJCAI-97, pages 1030--1035, 1997.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Steven Shapiro , Yves Lespérance , Hector J. Levesque, Specifying Communicative Multi-Agent Systems (Invited Paper), Proceedings of the Workshops on Commonsense Reasoning, Intelligent Agents, and Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Formalisms, Methodologies, and Applications, p.1-14, December 01, 1997
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
R. Smith. The contract net protocol: High level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-29(12):1104--1113, 1980.
|
| |
28
|
|
|