ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Trust and honour in information-based agency
Full text PdfPdf (375 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Trust and reputation table of contents
Pages: 1225 - 1232  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Carles Sierra  Institut d'Investigacio en Intel.ligencia Artificial Spanish Scientific Research Council, Catalonia, Spain
John Debenham  University of Technology, Sydney NSW, Australia
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160855
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An argumentation based negotiation model is supported by information theory. Argumentative dialogues change the models of agents with respect to ongoing relationships. Trust and Honour are key components. Trust measures expected deviations of behaviour in the execution of commitments. Honour measures the expected integrity of the arguments exchanged. We understand rhetorical moves in dialogues as actions to project the current relationships into the future.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142, 2 (2003), 205--237.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Jaynes, E. Probability Theory --- The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
 
8
Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., and Wooldridge, M. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 2 (2001), 199--215.
 
9
 
10
Li, Y., Bandar, Z. A., and McLean, D. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 14(4) (2003).
 
11
 
12
Paris, J. Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117, 1 (1999), 75--93.
 
13
Rosenschein, J. S., and Zlotkin, G. Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1994.
14
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Carles Sierra: colleagues
John Debenham: colleagues