ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
A comparative study of sequential and simultaneous auctions
Full text PdfPdf (186 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Auctions and electronic markets table of contents
Pages: 1205 - 1207  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Author
Shaheen S. Fatima  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160850
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper compares the sequential and simultaneous auctions for the following scenario. There are multiple similar objects for sale, each object is sold in a separate auction, and each bidder needs only one object. We use English auction rules and first determine equilibrium bidding strategies for the simultaneous and sequential cases. We do this for both common and private value objects by treating a bidder's information about these values as uncertain. We then consider the case where the private and common values have a uniform distribution and compare the two mechanisms in terms of three key properties: a bidder's ex-ante expected profit, the auctioneer's expected cumulative revenue, and the total expected surplus. For both common and private value objects, our study shows the following result. The expected cumulative revenue and the expected total surplus is higher for the sequential mechanism. However, a bidder's ex-ante expected profit depends on the number of objects being auctioned and the number of participating bidders, and it is sometimes higher for the sequential mechanism and sometimes for the simultaneous one.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Bernhardt and D. Scoones, A note on sequential auctions, American Economic Review, 84(3):653--657, 1994.
 
2
R.Engelbrecht-Wiggans and R. J. Weber, An example of a multi-object auction game, Management Science, 25(12):1272--1277, 1979.
3
 
4
J. K. Goeree and T. Offerman, Competitive bidding in auctions with private and common values, The Economic Journal 113(489):598--613, 2003.
 
5
A. Ortega-Reichert, Models of competitive bidding under uncertainty, Stanford University Technical Repeort, 8, 1968.
 
6
W. Vickrey, Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders, Journal of Finance 16:8--37, 1961.