ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computationally efficient and revenue optimized auctioneer's strategy for expanding auctions
Full text PdfPdf (337 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Auctions and electronic markets table of contents
Pages: 1175 - 1182  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Onn Shehory  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Eran Dror  Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160845
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An expanding auction---a special type of an ascending-price open-cry auction---allows the auctioneer to dynamically add (identical) items to the single item offered initially. Expanding auctions are becoming an increasingly popular business-to-consumer auction mechanism. The auctioneer's revenue from an expanding auction depends, in large part, on its schedule for increasing the number of units offered. As we show, the naïve strategies commonly used for increasing the number of items offered in contemporary e-commerce implementations of expanding auctions are sub-optimal. In this study we provide a strategy that, given some assumptions about buyers' behaviors, maximizes the expected revenues of the auctioneer in an expanding auction. We model the auction process as a state graph in which nodes are auction states and edges are transitions. With this model, finding the optimal strategy is equivalent to solving a search problem on the state graph. We prove that the search problem to be solved, although seemingly exponentially complex, is actually linearly bounded. Based on this result, we introduce an informed decision strategy that optimizes the auctioneer's revenue.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
www.olsale.co.il/olsale/rules.aspx?type=1
 
2
L. Ausubel, "An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects", Working Paper 97--06, U. Maryland, 1997.
 
3
L. Ausubel, "A Generalized Vickrey Auction", Working Paper, University of Maryland, 1999.
 
4
P. Cramton. Ascending Auctions, European Economic Review 42:3--5, 745--756, 1998.
 
5
 
6
P. Klemperer. Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 13(3) pp. 227--286, 1999.
 
7
E. Maskin, J. Riley, "Open and Sealed-Bid Auctions: Auction Theory with Private Values," American Economic Review, 75, 150--155, 1985.
 
8
P. Milgrom, R. Weber, "A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding", Econometrica, 50, 1089--1122, 1982.
 
9
R. Myerson, "Optimal Auction Design," Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58--73, 1981.
10
11
 
12
H. Varian, "Economic Mechanism Design for Computerized Agents", Working Paper, U. California, 1995.
 
13
W. Vickrey, Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders. J. of Finance, 16, 8--37, 1961.