|
ABSTRACT
Assigning tasks to agents is complex, especially in highly dynamic environments. Typical protocol-based approaches for task assignment such as Contract Net have proven their value, however, they may not be flexible enough to cope with continuously changing circumstances. In this paper we study and validate the feasibility of a field-based approach for task assignment in a complex problem domain.In particular, we apply the field-based approach for task assignment in an AGV transportation system. In this approach, transports emit fields into the environment that attract idle AGVs. To avoid multiple AGVs driving towards the same transport, AGVs emit repulsive fields. AGVs combine received fields and follow the gradient of the combined fields, that guide them towards pick locations of transports. The AGVs continuously reconsider the situation of the environment and task assignment is delayed until the load is picked, improves the flexibility of the system.Extensive experiments indicate that the field-based approach outperforms the standard Contract Net approach on various performance measures, such as the average wait time of transports and throughput. Limitations of the field-based approach are an unequal distribution of wait times across different transports and a small increase of bandwidth occupation.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Automatic Guided Vehicle Simulator, K. U. Leuven, 2005. http://www.es.kuleuven.ac.be/~distrinet/taskforces/agentwise/agvsimulator/.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
N. Boucke, D. Weyns, T. Holvoet, and K. Mertens. Decentralized allocation of tasks with delayed commencement. In Proceedings of European Workshop on Multiagent Systems, Barcelone, Spain, 2004.
|
| |
4
|
G. Buchman, D. Cohen, P. Vemaza, and D. Lee. The University of Pennsylvania Robocup 2005 Legged Soccer Team. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/robocup/U Penn05.pdf, 2005.
|
| |
5
|
Egemin Modular Controls Concept. EMC2 project, IWT, Belgium. http://emc2.egemin.com/, 2005.
|
| |
6
|
A. Farinelli, L. Iocchi, D. Nardi, and V. Ziparo. Task Assignment with Dynamic Perception and Constrained Tasks in a Multi-Robot System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
P. Hart, N. Nilsson, and B. Raphael. A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 1968.
|
| |
9
|
A. Helleboogh, T. Holvoet, D. Weyns, and Y. Berbers. Extending time management support for multi-agent systems. In Multiagent and Multiagent-based Simulation, New York, USA, 2005.
|
| |
10
|
T. Knabe, M. Schillo, and K. Fischer. Improvements to the FIPA Contract Net Protocol for Performance Increase and Cascading Applications. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiagent Interoperability, 2002.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
L. Breton, S. Maza, and P. Castagna. Simulation multi-agent de systèmes d'AGVs: comparaison avec une approche prédictive. 5e Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation, 2004.
|
| |
13
|
M. Mamei and F. Zambonelli. Motion coordination in the quake 3 arena environment: a field-based approach. First International Workshop on Environments for Multiagent Systems, 2003.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
M. Mamei, F. Zambonelli, and L. Leonardi. Co-Fields: A Physical Inspired Approach to Distributed Motion Coordination. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2004.
|
| |
16
|
F. D. Paoli and G. Vizzari. Context dependent management of field diffusion: an experimental framework. Workshop Dagli Oggetti agli Agenti, Villasimius, Italy, 2002.
|
| |
17
|
W. Schols, T. Holvoet, N. Boucke, and D. Weyns. Gradient Field Based Transport Assignment in AGV Systems. In CW-425, Technical Report, Departement of Computer Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/publicaties/rapporten/CW/2005/.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
R. G. Smith. The contract net protocol: High level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. In IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-29(12), 1980.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
D. Weyns, E. Steegmans, and T. Holvoet. Towards active perception for situated multi-agent systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18(8--9), 2004.
|
|