ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A formal model for designing dialogue strategies
Full text PdfPdf (153 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Argumentation and negotiation table of contents
Pages: 414 - 416  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Leila Amgoud  IRIT - CNRS, Toulouse Cedex, France
Nabil Hameurlain  Université de Pau, Pau Cedex, France
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160706
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Modeling different types of dialogue between autonomous agents is becoming an important research issue. Several proposals exist with a clear definition of the dialogue protocol, which is the set of rules governing the high level behaviour of the dialogue. However, things seem different with the notion of strategy. There is no consensus on the definition of a strategy and on the parameters necessary for its definition. Consequently, there are no methodology and no formal models for strategies.This paper argues that a strategy is a two steps decision process: i) to select the type of act to utter at a given step of a dialogue, and ii) to select the content which will accompany the act. The first step consists of selecting among all the acts allowed by the protocol, the best option which according to some strategic beliefs of the agent will at least satisfy the most important strategic goals of the agent. The second step consists of selecting among different alternatives (eg. different offers), the best one which, according to some basic beliefs of the agent, will satisfy the functional goals of the agent. The paper proposes then a formal model based on argumentation for computing on the basis of the above kinds of mental states, the best move (act + content) to play at a given step of the dialogue.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L. Amgoud. A general argumentation framework for inference and decision making. In Proceedings of the 21th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 26--33, 2005.
 
2
L. Amgoud and N. Maudet. Strategical considerations for argumentative agents. In Proc. of the 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, session "Argument, Dialogue, Decision", NMR'2002, 2002.
 
3
L. Amgoud and K. Souhila, On the study of negotiation strategies. In In AAMAS 2005 Workshop on Agent Communication (AC05), pages 3--16, 2005.
 
4
D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Leila Amgoud: colleagues
Nabil Hameurlain: colleagues