| Negotiating using rewards |
| Full text |
Pdf
(343 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Autonomous Agents
archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Argumentation and negotiation
table of contents
Pages: 400 - 407
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Sarvapali D. Ramchurn
|
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
|
|
Carles Sierra
|
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain
|
|
Lluis Godo
|
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain
|
|
Nicholas R. Jennings
|
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 4
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In situations where self-interested agents interact repeatedly, it is important that they are endowed with negotiation techniques that enable them to reach agreements that are profitable in the long run. To this end, we devise a novel negotiation algorithm that generates promises of rewards in future interactions, as a means of permitting agents to reach better agreements, in a shorter time, in the present encounter. Moreover, we thus develop a specific negotiation tactic based on this reward generation algorithm and show that it can achieve significantly bettter outcomes than existing benchmark tactics that do not use such inducements. Specifically, we show, via empirical evaluation, that our tactic can lead to a 26% improvement in the utility of deals that are made and that 21 times fewer messages need to be exchanged in order to achieve this under concrete settings.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
P. Faratin, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(3--4):159--182, 1998.
|
| |
3
|
P. Faratin, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Using similarity criteria to make trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 142(2):205--237, 2002.
|
| |
4
|
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A. R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2):199--215, 2001.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261--292, 1998.
|
| |
9
|
Iyad Rahwan , Sarvapali D. Ramchurn , Nicholas R. Jennings , Peter Mcburney , Simon Parsons , Liz Sonenberg, Argumentation-based negotiation, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.18 n.4, p.343-375, December 2003
[doi> DOI:10.1017/S0269888904000098]
|
| |
10
|
H. Raiffa. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Belknapp, 1982.
|
| |
11
|
S. D. Ramchurn, N. R. Jennings, and C. Sierra. Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach. In C. Reed, editor, Workshop on the Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI, pages 9--18, 2003.
|
| |
12
|
A. Rubinstein. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50:97--109, 1982.
|
| |
13
|
G. Tsebelis. Are sanctions effective? a game theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34:3--28, 1990.
|
|