ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An empirical evaluation of a testing and debugging methodology for Excel
Full text PdfPdf (562 KB)
Source International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering table of contents
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
SESSION: Software testing table of contents
Pages: 278 - 287  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-218-6
Authors
Jeffrey Carver  Mississippi State, MS
Marc Fisher, II  University of Nebraska -- Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Gregg Rothermel  University of Nebraska -- Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1159733.1159775
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Spreadsheets are one of the most commonly used types of programs in the world, and it is important that they be sufficiently dependable. To help end users who create spreadsheets do so more reliably, we have created a testing and debugging methodology and environment for use in spreadsheets, known as the WYSIWYT methodology. Our prior experiments with WYSIWYT show that users can utilize it to ensure that their spreadsheets are more dependable, but these experiments to date have considered only an unfamiliar prototype spreadsheet environment, and have not involved spreadsheet creation tasks. In this work we conducted a controlled experiment that addresses these limitations. The results of this study indicate that the use of WYSIWYT did not affect the correctness of spreadsheets created by users, but it did significantly reduce the amount of effort required to create them. Further, the subjects' evaluation of the help provided by WYSIWYT was very positive. Our results provide several insights into the use of the WYSIWYT methodology by end users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Ahmad, Y., Antoniu, T., Goldwater, S., and Krishnamurthi, S. "A Type System for Statically Detecting Spreadsheet Errors". In Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. Oct., 2003 p. 174--183
 
3
 
4
Ayalew, Y. and Mittermeir, R. "Interval-Based Testing for Spreadsheets". In Proceedings of International Arab Conference on Information Technology. University of Qatar, Qatar. Dec., 2002 p. 414--422
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Clermont, M. and Mittermeir, R. "Auditing Large Spreadsheet Programs". In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems Implementation and Modelling. Apr., 2003 p. 87--97
 
12
Cullen, D., Excel Snafu Costs Firm $24 Million, in The Register. 2003.
13
14
 
15
 
16
Fisher II, M., Rothermel, G., Creelan, T., and Burnett, M. Scaling a Dataflow Testing Methodology to the Multiparadigm World of Commercial Spreadsheets. TR-UNL-CSE-2005-0003. University of Nebraska -- Lincoln: Lincoln, NE USA.2005.
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
23
24
25
26
 
27
Sajaniemi, J., Modeling Spreadsheet Audit: A Rigorous Approach to Automatic Visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 2000. 11(1): p. 49--82.
 
28
Scott, A., Shurgard Stock Dives after Auditor Quits over Company's Accounting, in The Seattle Times. 2003.
 
29
30


REVIEW

"Andrew Brooks : Reviewer"

Spreadsheet errors are commonplace. What you see is what you test (WYSIWYT) extends the basic spreadsheet paradigm by allowing users to indicate cell values as either right or wrong. Using dataflow information, WYSIWYT color codes cells according   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey Carver: colleagues
Marc Fisher, II: colleagues
Gregg Rothermel: colleagues