Using multiversion data for non-interfering execution of write-only transactions

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Using multiversion data for non-interfering execution of write-only transactions

Full text

Pdf (964 KB)

Source

International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 1991 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents

Denver, Colorado, United States

Pages: 98 - 107

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-425-2

Also published in ...

Authors

D. Agrawal	Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
V. Krishnaswamy	Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA

Sponsors

SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 28, Citation Count: 4

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/115790.115801 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	D. Agrawal, A. J. Bernstein, P. Gupta, and S. Sengupta. Distributed Optimistic Concurrency Control with reduced Rollback. Distributed Computing, Springer-Verlag, 2(1):45-59, January 1987.
	2	Divyakant Agrawal , Amr El Abbadi, Locks with constrained sharing (extended abstract), Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, p.85-93, April 02-04, 1990, Nashville, Tennessee, United States [doi>10.1145/298514.298545]
	3	D. Agrawal and V. Krishnaswamy. Using Multiversion Data for Non-interfering Execution of Write-only Transactions. Technical report, Department of Cornputer Science, University of California at Santa Barbara, CA 93106, 1991. TRCS 91-3.
	4	D. Agrawal , S. Sengupta, Modular synchronization in multiversion databases: version control and concurrency control, Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.408-417, June 1989, Portland, Oregon, United States
	5	Philip A. Bernstein , Nathan Goodman, Multiversion concurrency control—theory and algorithms, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.8 n.4, p.465-483, Dec. 1983 [doi>10.1145/319996.319998]
	6	Arvola Chan , Stephen Fox , Wen-Te K. Lin , Anil Nori , Daniel R. Ries, The implementation of an integrated concurrency control and recovery scheme, Proceedings of the 1982 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, June 02-04, 1982, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/582353.582386]
	7	K. P. Eswaran , J. N. Gray , R. A. Lorie , I. L. Traiger, The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system, Communications of the ACM, v.19 n.11, p.624-633, Nov. 1976 [doi>10.1145/360363.360369]
	8	Abdelsalam Abdelhamid Heddaya, Managing event-based replication for abstract data types in distributed systems, 1988
	9	Maurice Herlihy, A quorum-consensus replication method for abstract data types, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), v.4 n.1, p.32-53, Feb. 1986 [doi>10.1145/6306.6308]
	10	H. T. Kung , John T. Robinson, On optimistic methods for concurrency control, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.6 n.2, p.213-226, June 1981 [doi>10.1145/319566.319567]
	11	Christos H. Papadimitriou, The serializability of concurrent database updates, Journal of the ACM (JACM), v.26 n.4, p.631-653, Oct. 1979 [doi>10.1145/322154.322158]
	12	D. P. Reed, NAMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DECENTRALIZED COMPUTER SYSTEM, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1978
	13	William E. Weihl, Distributed version management for read-only actions, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.13 n.1, p.55-64, Jan. 1987 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1987.232835]
	14	W. E. Weihl, Local atomicity properties: modular concurrency control for abstract data types, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.11 n.2, p.249-282, April 1989 [doi>10.1145/63264.63518]

CITED BY 4

	Baojing Lu , Qinghua Zou , William Perrizo, A dual copy method for transaction separation with multiversion control for read-only transactions, Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on Applied computing, p.290-294, March 2001, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
	Transaction-centric reconciliation in disconnected client-server databases, Mobile Networks and Applications, v.9 n.5, p.459-471, October 2004
	Sanjay Kumar Madria , M. Baseer , Vijay Kumar , Sourav Bhowmick, A transaction model and multiversion concurrency control for mobile database systems, Distributed and Parallel Databases, v.22 n.2-3, p.165-196, December 2007
	François Llirbat , Eric Simon , Dimitri Tombroff, Using Versions in Update Transactions: Application to Integrity Checking, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, p.96-105, August 25-29, 1997