|
ABSTRACT
This paper formalizes the semantics of trust and studies the transitivity of trust. On the Web, people and software agents have to interact with "strangers". This makes trust a crucial factor on the Web. Basically trust is established in interaction between two entities and any one entity only has a finite number of direct trust relationships. However, activities on the Web require entities to interact with other unfamiliar or unknown entities. As a promising remedy to this problem, social networks-based trust, in which A trusts B, B trusts C, so A indirectly trusts C, is receiving considerable attention. A necessary condition for trust propagation in social networks is that trust needs to be transitive. However, is trust transitive? What types of trust are transitive and why? There are no theories and models found so far to answer these questions in a formal manner. Most models either directly assume trust transitive or do not give a formal discussion of why trust is transitive. To fill this gap, this paper constructs a logical theory of trust in the form of ontology that gives formal and explicit specification for the semantics of trust. Based on this formal semantics, two types of trust -- trust in belief and trust in performance are identified, the transitivity of trust in belief is formally proved, and the conditions for trust propagation are derived. These results give theoretical evidence to support making trust judgment using social networks on the Web.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
K. Blomqvist. The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(3):271--286, 1997.
|
| |
4
|
S. Buvac and I. Mason. Propositional logic of context. In Proceedings of AAAI'1993, 1993.
|
| |
5
|
R. Demolombe. To trust information sources: a proposal for a modal logical framework. In Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pages 9--19, 1998.
|
| |
6
|
M. Deutsch. Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. Jones, editor, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, volume X, pages 275--318, 1962.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
M. S. Fox and J. Huang. Knowledge provenance: An approach to modeling and maintaining the evolution and validity of knowledge. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/km/papers/fox-kp1.pdf, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
M. S. Fox and J. Huang. Knowledge provenance in enterprise information. International Journal of Production Research, 43(20):4471--4492, 2005.
|
| |
10
|
D. Gambetta. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell, 1988.
|
| |
11
|
G. Gans, M. Jarke, S. Kethers, and G. Lakemeyer. Modeling the impact of trust and distrust in agent networks. In AOIS-01 at CAiSE-01, 2001.
|
| |
12
|
J. Golbeck, J. Hendler, and B. Parsia. Trust networks on the semantic web. 2002.
|
| |
13
|
M. Gruninger and M. Fox. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-1995, 1995.
|
 |
14
|
R. Guha , Ravi Kumar , Prabhakar Raghavan , Andrew Tomkins, Propagation of trust and distrust, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, May 17-20, 2004, New York, NY, USA
[doi> 10.1145/988672.988727]
|
| |
15
|
J. Huang and M. S. Fox. Dynamic knowledge provenance. In Proceedings of Business Agents and Semantic Web Workshop, pages 11--20, 2004.
|
| |
16
|
J. Huang and M. S. Fox. Uncertainty in knowledge provenance. In C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel, and R. Studer, editors, The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3053, pages 372--387, 2004.
|
| |
17
|
J. Huang and M. S. Fox. Trust judgment in knowledge provenance. In Proceedings of DEXA2005 (4th International Workshop on Web Semantics), pages 524--528. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
|
| |
18
|
A. Josang, L. Gray, and M. Kinateder. A model for analysing transitive trust. 2005.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
J. Lewis and A. Weigert. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4):967--985, 1985.
|
| |
21
|
N. Luhmann. Trust and Power. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1979.
|
| |
22
|
S. P. Marsh. Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, 1994.
|
| |
23
|
R. Mayer, J. Davis, and F. Schoorman. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academic of Management Review, 20(3):709--734, 1995.
|
| |
24
|
J. McCarthy. Notes on formalizing context. In Proceedings of IJCAI1993, 1993.
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
R. Reiter. Knowledge In Action. The MIT Press, 2001.
|
| |
28
|
M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos. Trust management for the semantic web. In Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference, pages 351--368, 2003.
|
| |
29
|
J. Rotter. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality, 35:651--665, 1967.
|
| |
30
|
D. M. Roussea, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academic of Management Review, 23(3):393--404, 1998.
|
| |
31
|
H. A. Simon. Models of Bounded Rationality, volume 3. The MIT Press, 1997.
|
| |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
L. Zucker. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8:53--111, 1986.
|
|