ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A reputation mechanism for layered communities
Full text PdfPdf (159 KB)
Source ACM SIGecom Exchanges archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 1  (June 2006) table of contents
Pages: 11 - 22  
Year of Publication: 2006
Authors
Elodie Fourquet  David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
Kate Larson  David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
William Cowan  David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1150735.1150738
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The exchange of digital goods via peer-to-peer (P2P) systems is a challenging problem for e-commerce. Participants rarely know each other, and may be completely anonymous, so the self-interest of the participants works against trust and they miss out on the benefits of cooperation. Reputation mechanisms help to remedy selfish misbehaviour. In this paper a new layered reputation mechanism establishes a trusted P2P environment, with bad content filtered out and novel content continuously introduced, by giving appropriate incentives to participants. A simulation was created and experiments run to validate the design.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
COHEN, B. 2003. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems.
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
FOURQUET, E. 2005. A layered reputation model for Peer-to-Peer system. Class report, CS656, David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo.
7
8
 
9
KAMIEN, M. AND SCHWARTZ, N. 1991. Dynamic optimization: The calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management, 2nd ed. Advanced Textbooks in Economics. North Holland, Amsterdam.
10
 
11
 
12
LIANG, J., KUMAR, R., XI, Y., AND Ross, K. 2005. Pollution in P2P file sharing systems. In INFOCOM '05: Proceedings 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Vol. 2. 1174-1185.
 
13
 
14
MARTI, S. AND GARCIA-MOLINA, H. 2006. Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing P2P reputation systems. Computer Networks 50, 4, 472-484.
 
15
PAPAIOANNOU, T. AND STAMOULIS, G. 2005. An incentives' mechanism for promoting truthful feedback in Peer-to-Peer systems. In CCGRID '05: Proceedings of 5th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (Workshop on Global P2P Computing). IEEE Computer Society Press, 275-283.
 
16
 
17
RESNICK, P. AND ZECKHAUSER, R. 2002. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. In The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce, M. R. Baye, Ed. Advances in Applied Microeconomics, vol. 11. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 127-157.
 
18
SCHLOSSER, M. T., CONDIE, T. E., AND KAMVAR, S. D. 2003. Simulating a file-sharing P2P network. In 1st Workshop on Semantics in Grid and P2P Networks.
 
19
SEABRIGHT, P. 2004. The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
 
20
SURYANARAYANA, G. AND TAYLOR, R. N. 2004. A survey of trust management and resource discovery technologies in Peer-to-Peer applications. Tech. Rep. UCI-ISR-04-6, Institute for Software Research. University of California, Irvine.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Elodie Fourquet: colleagues
Kate Larson: colleagues
William Cowan: colleagues