ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring and extracting proximity in networks
Full text PdfPdf (591 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
SESSION: Research track papers table of contents
Pages: 245 - 255  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-339-5
Authors
Yehuda Koren  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
Stephen C. North  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
Chris Volinsky  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 165,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1150402.1150432
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Measuring distance or some other form of proximity between objects is a standard data mining tool. Connection subgraphs were recently proposed as a way to demonstrate proximity between nodes in networks. We propose a new way of measuring and extracting proximity in networks called "cycle free effective conductance"(CFEC). Our proximity measure can handle more than two endpoints, directed edges, is statistically well-behaved, and produces an effectiveness score for the computed subgraphs. We provide an efficien talgorithm. Also, we report experimental results and show examples for three large network data sets: a telecommunications calling graph, the IMDB actors graph, and an academic co-authorship network.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509--512, October 1999.
2
 
3
B. Bollobas. Modern Graph Theory. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
 
4
U. Brandes and D. Fleischer. Centrality measures based on current flow. In Proc. 22nd Symp. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS '05), pages 533--544. LNCS 3404, Springer-Verlag, 2005.
5
 
6
 
7
DBLP computer science bibliography. dblp.uni-trier.de.
 
8
P. G. Doyle and J. L. Snell. Random Walks and Electrical Networks. The Mathematical Association of America, 1984. http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0001057.
9
10
 
11
12
 
13
E. Hadjiconstantinou and N. Christofides. An efficient implementation of an algorithm for finding k shortest simple paths. Networks, 34:88--101, 1999.
 
14
Internet Movie Database. www.imdb.com.
 
15
M. M. John Hershberger and S. Suri. Finding the k shortest simple paths: A new algorithm and its implementation. In Proc. 5th Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experimentation (ALENEX '05), pages 26--36. SIAM, 2003.
 
16
N. Katoh, T. Ibaraki, and H. Mine. An efficient algorithm for k shortest simple paths. Networks, 12:411--427, 1982.
 
17
K. Lang. Finding good nearly balanced cuts in power law graphs. Technical report, Yahoo Research Labs, 2004.
18
 
19
A. Popescul and L. H. Ungar. Statistical relational learning for link prediction. In Proc. Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data (IJCAI '03), 2003.
 
20
W. E. Winkler. The state of record linkage and current research problems. Technical report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1999.

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yehuda Koren: colleagues
Stephen C. North: colleagues
Chris Volinsky: colleagues