ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Efficient algorithms for bichromatic separability
Full text PdfPdf (326 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 2  (April 2006) table of contents
Pages: 209 - 227  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Pankaj K. Agarwal  Duke University, Durham, NC
Boris Aronov  Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Vladlen Koltun  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1150334.1150338
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A closed solid body separates one point set from another if it contains the former and the closure of its complement contains the latter. We present a near-linear algorithm for deciding whether two sets of n points in ℝ3 can be separated by a prism, near-quadratic algorithms for separating by a slab or a wedge, and a near-cubic algorithm for separating by a double wedge. The latter three algorithms improve the previous best known results by an order of magnitude, while the prism separability algorithm constitutes an improvement of two orders of magnitude.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agarwal, P. K., and Sharir, M. 2000. Arrangements and their applications. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, Eds. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 49--119.
 
2
 
3
Arkin, E., Hurtado, F., Mitchell, J., Seara, C., and Skiena, S. 2001. Some lower bounds on geometric separability problems. In Proceedings of the 11th Fall Workshop on Computational Geometry.
 
4
Aronov, B., and Iacono, J. 2004. Detecting duplicates among similar bit vectors. In Proceedings of the 14th Fall Workshop on Computational Geometry.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Boissonnat, J.-D., Czyzowicz, J., Devillers, O., Urrutia, J., and Yvinec, M. 2000. Computing largest circles separating two sets of segments. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl. 10, 41--54.
 
8
Brönnimann, H., and Goodrich, M. T. 1995. Almost optimal set covers in finite VC-dimension. Disc. Comput. Geom. 14, 463--479.
 
9
de Berg, M., Dobrindt, K., and Schwarzkopf, O. 1995. On lazy randomized incremental construction. Disc. Comput. Geom. 14, 261--286.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Eppstein, D. 1992. Dynamic three-dimensional linear programming. ORSA J. Comput. 4, 360--368.
 
13
Fekete, S. 1992. On the complexity of min-link red-blue separation. Unpublished manuscript.
 
14
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
 
15
 
16
 
17
Hurtado, F., Seara, C., and Sethia, S. 2003. Red-blue separability problems in 3D. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computational Geometry and Applications.
 
18
 
19
Megiddo, N. 1983. Linear-time algorithms for linear programming in R3 and related problems. SIAM J. Comput. 12, 759--776.
 
20
Mitchell, J. S. B. 1993. Approximation algorithms for geometric separation problems. Tech. Rep. Dept. Applied Mathematics, SUNY Stony Brook, NY.
 
21
O'Rourke, J., Kosaraju, S. R., and Megiddo, N. 1986. Computing circular separability. Disc. Comput. Geom. 1, 105--113.
 
22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pankaj K. Agarwal: colleagues
Boris Aronov: colleagues
Vladlen Koltun: colleagues