| A UML 2.0 profile for WebML modeling |
| Full text |
Pdf
(250 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference On Web Engineering; Vol. 155
archive
Workshop proceedings of the sixth international conference on Web engineering
table of contents
Palo Alto, California
WORKSHOP SESSION: Second international workshop on model driven web engineering (MDWE'06)
table of contents
Article No. 4
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-435-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30, Downloads (12 Months): 98, Citation Count: 4
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In recent years, we have witnessed how the Web Engineering community considers the use of standard UML notation, techniques and supporting tools for modeling Web systems, including the adaptation of their own modeling languages, representation diagrams and development processes to UML. This interest for being MOF and UML-compliant arises from the increasing need to be able to interoperate with other notations and tools, and to exchange data and models, thus facilitating and improving reuse. WebML, like any other Domain Specific Language (DSL), allows to express in a precise and natural way the concepts and mechanisms of its domain of reference. However, it cannot fully interoperate with other notations, nor can it be integrated with other tools. As a solution to these requirements, in this paper we describe a UML 2.0 profile for WebML which allows WebML models to be used in conjunction with other notations and modeling tools.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
WebML resources. http://www.webml.org/webml/page5.do.
|
| |
2
|
L. Baresi, F. Garzotto, and M. Maritati. W2000 as a MOF Metamodel. In Proc. of World Multiconf. on Systemics, volume 1, 2002.
|
| |
3
|
Stefano Ceri , Piero Fraternali , Aldo Bongio , Marco Brambilla , Sara Comai , Maristella Matera, Designing Data-Intensive Web Applications, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 2002
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
I. Garrigós, J. Gómez, and C. Cachero. Modelling Dynamic Personalization in Web Applications. Proc. of ICWE'03, LNCS 2722:472--475, 2003. Spain.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
J. Ivers, P. Clements, D. Garlan, R. Nord, B. Schmerl, and J. R. O. Silva. Documenting Component and Connector Views with UML 2.0. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2004-TR-008, Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2004.
|
| |
8
|
N. Koch and A. Kraus. Towards a common metamodel for the development of Web applications. Proc. of ICWE'03, LNCS 2722:495--506, 2003. Oviedo, Spain.
|
| |
9
|
A. Kraus and N. Koch. A Metamodel for UWE. Technical Report 0301, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, January 2003.
|
| |
10
|
Object Management Group. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification, 2005. http://www.omg.org/cgibin/apps/doc?formal/05-07-04.pdf.
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Escalona , J. J. Gutiérrez , L. Rodríguez-Catalán , A. Guevara, Model-driven in reverse: the practical experience of the AQUA project, Proceedings of the 2009 Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems: New Opportunities to increase Digital Citizenship, p.1-6, June 03-05, 2009, Prague, Czech Republic
|
|