ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read
Full text PdfPdf (340 KB)
Source Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
Odense, Denmark
SESSION: Social networks, networking & virtual communities table of contents
Pages: 31 - 40  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-417-0
Authors
Cameron Marlow  Yahoo! Research Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Mor Naaman  Yahoo! Research Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Danah Boyd  Yahoo! Research Berkeley, Berkeley, CA and UC Berkeley School of Information, Berkeley, CA
Marc Davis  Yahoo! Research Berkeley, Berkeley, CA and UC Berkeley School of Information, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 148,   Downloads (12 Months): 669,   Citation Count: 78
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years, tagging systems have become increasingly popular. These systems enable users to add keywords (i.e., "tags") to Internet resources (e.g., web pages, images, videos) without relying on a controlled vocabulary. Tagging systems have the potential to improve search, spam detection, reputation systems, and personal organization while introducing new modalities of social communication and opportunities for data mining. This potential is largely due to the social structure that underlies many of the current systems.Despite the rapid expansion of applications that support tagging of resources, tagging systems are still not well studied or understood. In this paper, we provide a short description of the academic related work to date. We offer a model of tagging systems, specifically in the context of web-based systems, to help us illustrate the possible benefits of these tools. Since many such systems already exist, we provide a taxonomy of tagging systems to help inform their analysis and design, and thus enable researchers to frame and compare evidence for the sustainability of such systems. We also provide a simple taxonomy of incentives and contribution models to inform potential evaluative frameworks. While this work does not present comprehensive empirical results, we present a preliminary study of the photo-sharing and tagging system Flickr to demonstrate our model and explore some of the issues in one sample system. This analysis helps us outline and motivate possible future directions of research in tagging systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Brieger, R.L., 1991. Explorations in Structural Analysis: Dual and Multiple Networks of Social Structure. New York: Garland Press.
 
3
Breese, J.S., Heckermen, D. and Kadie, C.M. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Microsoft Research Technical Report, (MSR-TR-98-12), October 1998.
 
4
Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
5
 
6
Coates, T. Two cultures of fauxonomies collide. June 4 2005. http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/06/two_cultures_of_fauxonomies_collide.shtml
 
7
Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks. 1, 215--239
8
 
9
Golder, S., and Huberman, B. A. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. HP Labs technical report, 2005. Available from <http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/tags/>
 
10
Gyongi, Z., Garcia-Molina, H., Pederson, J. Combating spam with trustrank. n Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), 2004.
 
11
Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. and Scott, J. Social Bookmarking Tools - A General Overview. D-Lib Magazine 11, 4 (April 2005)Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. and Scott, J. Social Bookmarking Tools - A General Overview. D-Lib Magazine 11, 4 (April 2005)
 
12
Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. and Scott, J. Social Bookmarking Tools - A Case Study. D-Lib Magazine 11, 4 (April 2005)
 
13
 
14
Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005.
 
15
 
16
Mathes, A. Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. UIC Technical Report, 2004.
 
17
Merholz, P. Clay Shirky's Viewpoints are Overrated. http://www.peterme.com/archives/000558.html
 
18
Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani,R. and Winograd, T.. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University, 1998.
 
19
Rice, J.A., Mathematical statistics and data analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press (1995)
 
20
Shirky, C. Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags. http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
 
21
Udell, Jon. Collaborative filtering with Del.icio.us. June 23, 2005. http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2005/06/23.html
 
22
Vander Wal, T. Folksonomy Definition and Wikipedia. November 2, 2005. http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1750
23
24
 
25
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K.. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
 
26
White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., and Breiger, R.L. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks: Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology. 81, 730--779

CITED BY  78

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cameron Marlow: colleagues
Mor Naaman: colleagues
Danah Boyd: colleagues
Marc Davis: colleagues