ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization
Full text PdfPdf (2.31 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 2  (May 2006) table of contents
Pages: 188 - 220  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Pratik Biswas  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Tzu-Chen Lian  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Ta-Chung Wang  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Yinyu Ye  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 270,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149283.1149286
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An SDP relaxation based method is developed to solve the localization problem in sensor networks using incomplete and inaccurate distance information. The problem is set up to find a set of sensor positions such that given distance constraints are satisfied. The nonconvex constraints in the formulation are then relaxed in order to yield a semidefinite program that can be solved efficiently.The basic model is extended in order to account for noisy distance information. In particular, a maximum likelihood based formulation and an interval based formulation are discussed. The SDP solution can then also be used as a starting point for steepest descent based local optimization techniques that can further refine the SDP solution.We also describe the extension of the basic method to develop an iterative distributed SDP method for solving very large scale semidefinite programs that arise out of localization problems for large dense networks and are intractable using centralized methods.The performance evaluation of the technique with regard to estimation accuracy and computation time is also presented by the means of extensive simulations.Our SDP scheme also seems to be applicable to solving other Euclidean geometry problems where points are locally connected.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Biswas, P., Aghajan, H., and Ye, Y. 2005a. Integration of angle of arrival information for multimodal sensor network localization using semidefinite programming. Tech. rep., Wireless Sensor Networks Lab, Stanford University, May.
 
4
Biswas, P., Liang, T.-C., Toh, K.-C., and Ye, Y. 2005b. An SDP based approach for anchor-free 3d graph realization. Tech. rep., Dept of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University. Submitted to SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. March.
 
5
Biswas, P. and Ye, Y. 2003. A distributed method for solving semidefinite programs arising from ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. Tech. rep., Dept of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, October.
6
 
7
Boyd, S., Ghaoui, L. E., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V. 1994. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM.
 
8
Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2000. Gps-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. Tech. rep., Computer science department, University of Southern California, April.
 
9
Carter, M., Jin, H., Saunders, M., and Ye, Y. 2005. Spaseloc: An adaptable subproblem algorithm for scalable wireless network localization. Submitted to the SIAM J. on Optimization.
10
 
11
Cox, T. and Cox, M. A. A. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman Hall/CRC, London.
 
12
Doherty, L., Ghaoui, L. E., and Pister, K. S. J. 2001. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom. Anchorage, Alaska, 1655--1663.
 
13
Ganesan, D., Krishnamachari, B., Woo, A., Culler, D., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. 2002. An empirical study of epidemic algorithms in large scale multihop wireless networks.
 
14
Groenen, P. 1993. The Majorization Approach to Multidimensional Scaling: Some Problems and Extensions. DSWO Press, Leiden University.
 
15
 
16
Howard, A., Matarić, M., and Sukhatme, G. 2001. Relaxation on a mesh: a formalism for generalized localization. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Wailea, Hawaii, 1055--1060.
 
17
 
18
Laurent, M. 2001. Matrix completion problems. The Encyclopedia of Optimization 3, 221--229.
 
19
Liang, T.-C., Wang, T.-C., and Ye, Y. 2004. A gradient search method to round the semidefinite programming relaxation solution for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. Tech. rep., Dept of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, August.
 
20
 
21
Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2001. Ad hoc positioning system (APS). In GLOBECOM (1). 2926--2931.
 
22
Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2003. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AoA. In INFOCOM. San Francisco, CA.
 
23
Patwari, N. and Hero III, A. O. 2002. Location estimation accuracy in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of Asilomar Conference on Signals and Systems. Pacific Grove, CA.
24
 
25
26
27
 
28
Shang, Y. and Ruml, W. 2004. Improved MDS-based localization. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the IEEE Communicatons Society (Infocom 2004).
29
 
30
 
31
So, A. M.-C. and Ye, Y. 2004. Theory of semidefinite programming relaxation for sensor network localization. Tech. rep., Dept of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, April.
 
32
Sturm, J. F. 1999. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software 11 & 12, 625--633.
 
33

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pratik Biswas: colleagues
Tzu-Chen Lian: colleagues
Ta-Chung Wang: colleagues
Yinyu Ye: colleagues