Visualization of areas of interest in software architecture diagrams

ABSTRACT

Understanding complex software systems requires getting insight in how system properties, such as performance, trust, reliability, or structural attributes, correspond to the system architecture. Such properties can be seen as defining several 'areas of interest' over the system architecture. We visualize areas of interest atop of system architecture diagrams using a new technique that minimizes visual clutter for multiple, overlapping areas for large diagrams, yet preserves the diagram layout familiar to designers. We illustrate our proposed techniques on several UML diagrams of complex, real-world systems.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sunil Arya , David M. Mount , Nathan S. Netanyahu , Ruth Silverman , Angela Y. Wu, An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions, Journal of the ACM (JACM), v.45 n.6, p.891-923, Nov. 1998 [doi>10.1145/293347.293348]
• 2: M. Balzer , O. Deussen, Exploring Relations within Software Systems Using Treemap Enhanced Hierarchical Graphs, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis, p.25, September 25-25, 2005 [doi>10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684312]
• 3: Bondarev, E., Chaudron, M., and De With, P. 2006, to appear. A process for resolving performance trade-offs in component-based architectures. In Proc. 9th Intl. Symposium of Component-Based Software Engineering, Springer LNCS.
• 4: Borland. 2005. Together. www.borland.com/together.
• 5: Heorhiy Byelas , Egor Bondarev , Alexandru Telea, Visualization of Areas of Interest in Component-Based System Architectures, Proceedings of the 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, p.160-169, August 29-September 01, 2006 [doi>10.1109/EUROMICRO.2006.65]
• 6: Luciano da Fontoura Da Costa , Roberto Marcondes Cesar, Jr., Shape Analysis and Classification: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 2000
• 7: Dunke, R., and Schmietendorf, A. 2000. Possibilities of the description and evaluation of software components. Metrics News 5.
• 8: Norman E. Fenton , Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, PWS Publishing Co., Boston, MA, 1998
• 9: . Beszé, Columbus - Reverse Engineering Tool and Schema for C++, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'02), p.172, October 03-06, 2002
• 10: Emden R. Gansner , Stephen C. North, An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering, Software—Practice & Experience, v.30 n.11, p.1203-1233, Sept. 2000 [doi>10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.3.CO;2-E]
• 11: N. S. Gill , P. S. Grover, Component-based measurement: few useful guidelines, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.28 n.6, November 2003 [doi>10.1145/966221.966237]
• 12: Goulao, M., and Abreu, F. 2004. Formalizing metrics for COTS. In Proc. MPEC'04, Edimburgh.
• 13: IBM. 2005. Rational Rose. www.306.ibm.com/software/rational.
• 14: ITEA. 2002. ROBOCOP: A robust open component-based software architecture for configurable devices. Public document, version 1.0. available at www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/robocop.
• 15: ITEA. 2005. Trust4All project. www.win.tue.nl/trust4all.
• 16: LaQuso. 2006. Laboratory for quality of software. Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. www.laquso.com.
• 17: Andrian Marcus , Louis Feng , Jonathan I. Maletic, 3D representations for software visualization, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, June 11-13, 2003, San Diego, California [doi>10.1145/774833.774837]
• 18: Anders Moller , Mikael Akerholm , Johan Fredriksson , Mikael Nolin, Evaluation of Component Technologies with Respect to Industrial Requirements, Proceedings of the 30th EUROMICRO Conference, p.56-63, August 31-September 03, 2004 [doi>10.1109/EUROMICRO.2004.30]
• 19: J. Rilling , S. P. Mudur, On the Use of Metaballs to Visually Map Source Code Structures and Analysis Results onto 3D Space, Proceedings of the Ninth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'02), p.299, October 29-November 01, 2002
• 20: Jonathan Richard Shewchuk, Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator, Selected papers from the Workshop on Applied Computational Geormetry, Towards Geometric Engineering, p.203-222, May 27-28, 1996
• 21: T. C. Sprenger , R. Brunella , M. H. Gross, H-BLOB: a hierarchical visual clustering method using implicit surfaces, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '00, p.61-68, October 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
• 22: Taubin, G. 2000. Geometric signal processing on polygonal meshes. In EUROGRAPHICS STAR Reports.
• 23: Alexandru Telea , Jarke J. van Wijk, An augmented Fast Marching Method for computing skeletons and centerlines, Proceedings of the symposium on Data Visualisation 2002, May 27-29, 2002, Barcelona, Spain
• 24: M. Termeer , C. F. J. Lange , A. Telea , M. R. V. Chaudron, Visual Exploration of Combined Architectural and Metric Information, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis, p.11, September 25-25, 2005 [doi>10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684298]
• 25: Tilley, S., Wong, K., Storey, M., and Müller, H. 1994. Programmable reverse engineering. Intl. J. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 4, 4, 501--520.
• 26: Alexandru Telea , Lucian Voinea, A Framework for Interactive Visualization of Component-Based Software, Proceedings of the 30th EUROMICRO Conference, p.567-574, August 31-September 03, 2004 [doi>10.1109/EUROMICRO.2004.3]
• 27: Woo, M., Neider, J., Davis, T., and Shreiner, D. 2001. OpenGL Programming Guide, 3rd edition. Addison-Wesley.
• 28: Wust, J. 2005. SDMetrics: The software design metrics tool for UML. www.sdmetrics.com.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Computer-aided software engineering (CASE)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.4 Graphics Utilities
          Subjects: Paint systems

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Computer-aided software engineering (CASE)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.4 Graphics Utilities

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation

Keywords:
UML diagrams, architecture visualization, areas of interest, metrics