ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing with highly mixed states
Full text PdfPdf (224 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 53 ,  Issue 3  (May 2006) table of contents
Pages: 507 - 531  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Andris Ambainis  University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, Ont., Waterloo, Canada
Leonard J. Schulman  California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
Umesh Vazirani  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1147954.1147962
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Device initialization is a difficult challenge in some proposed realizations of quantum computers, and as such, must be treated as a computational resource. The degree of initialization can be quantified by k, the number of clean qubits in the initial state of the register. In this article, we show that unless mO(k + log n), oblivious (gate-by-gate) simulation of an ideal m-qubit quantum circuit by an n-qubit circuit with k clean qubits is impossible. Effectively, this indicates that there is no avoiding physical initialization of a quantity of qubits proportional to that required by the best ideal quantum circuit.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Adams, J. F. 1982. Lectures on Lie Groups. University of Chicago Press.
 
3
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J., and Weinfurter, H. 1995. Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457--3467.
 
4
 
5
Chuang, I. L., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Zhou, X., Leung D. W., and Lloyd, S. 1998. Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm. Nature 393, 143--146.
 
6
Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F., and Havel, T. F. 1997. Ensemble quantum computing by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 1634--1639.
 
7
Fulton, W., and Harris, J. 1991. Representation Theory. A First Course. Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
8
Gershenfeld, N., and Chuang, I. 1997. Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science 275, 350.
 
9
Hoffman, P. N., and Humphreys, J. F. 1992. Projective Representations of the Symmetric Groups. Oxford University Press.
 
10
Knill, E., and Laflamme, R. 1998. On the power of one bit of quantum information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672.
 
11
Mishchenko, S. P. 1996. Lower bounds on the dimensions of irreducible representations of symmetric groups and of the exponents of the exponential of varieties of Lie algebras. Matemat. Sbornik 187, 83--94.
 
12
 
13
Nielsen, M. Probability distributions consistent with a mixed state. LANL archive, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9909020.
 
14
 
15
Rasala, R. 1977. On the minimal degrees of characters of Sn. J. Algebra 45, 132--181.
 
16
Sagan, B. 2001. The Symmetric Group (2nd edition). Springer-Verlag, New York.
17
 
18
 
19
Vandersypen, L., Steffen, M., Breyta, G., Yannoni, C., Cleve, R., and Chuang, I. 2000. Experimental realization of an order-finding algorithm with an NMR quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5452--5455.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andris Ambainis: colleagues
Leonard J. Schulman: colleagues
Umesh Vazirani: colleagues