| Multiple-detect ATPG based on physical neighborhoods |
| Full text |
Pdf
(547 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 43rd annual Design Automation Conference
table of contents
San Francisco, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 61: test response compaction and ATPG
table of contents
Pages: 1099 - 1102
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-381-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 19, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Multiple-detect test sets detect single stuck line faults multiple times, and thus have a higher probability of detecting complex defects. But current definitions of what constitutes a new test for a single stuck line fault do not leverage defect locality. Recent work has proposed a new metric to capture quality of a multiple-detect test set based on the number of unique states on lines in the physical neighborhood of a targeted line. This paper presents a new ATPG strategy that uses this metric to generate higher quality multiple-detect test sets.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. D. Blanton, "Methods for Characterizing, Generating Test Sequences for, and Simulating Integrated Circuit Faults Using Fault Tuples and Related Systems and Computer Program Products," Dec. 2004, U. S. Patent no. 6, 836, 856.
|
| |
2
|
B. Keller, "Hierarchical Pattern Faults for Describing Logic Circuit Failure Mechanisms," 1994, U. S. Patent no. 5, 546, 408.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
A. Jain, "Arbitrary Defects;Modeling and Applications," Master's Thesis, Rutgers Univ., 1999.
|
| |
5
|
R. D. Blanton, et al., "Analyzing the Effectiveness of Multiple-Detect Test Sets," ITC, pp. 876 --885, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
S. Lee , B. Cobb , J. Dworak , M. Grimaila , M. Mercer, A New ATPG Algorithm to Limit Test Set Size and Achieve Multiple Detections of All Faults, Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, p.94, March 04-08, 2002
|
| |
7
|
B. Benware, et al., "Impact of Multiple-Detect Test Patterns on Product Quality," ITC, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
Srikanth Venkataraman , Srihari Sivaraj , Enamul Amyeen , Sangbong Lee , Ajay Ojha , Ruifeng Guo, An Experimental Study of N-Detect Scan ATPG Patterns on a Processor, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, p.23, April 25-29, 2004
|
| |
9
|
Huaxing Tang , Gang Chen , Sudhakar M. Reddy , Chen Wang , Janusz Rajski , Irith Pomeranz, Defect Aware Test Patterns, Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, p.450-455, March 07-11, 2005
[doi> 10.1109/DATE.2005.110]
|
| |
10
|
I. Pomeranz and S. M. Reddy, "On N-Detection Test Sets and Variable N-Detection Test Sets for Transition Faults," IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 372--383, March 2002.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
W. Maly and J. Deszczka, "Yield Estimation Model for VLSI Artwork Evaluation," Electronic Letters, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 226--227, March 1983.
|
| |
13
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
|
|
|
Yen-Tzu Lin , Osei Poku , Naresh K. Bhatti , R. D. (Shawn) Blanton, Physically-aware N-detect test pattern selection, Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, March 10-14, 2008, Munich, Germany
|
|
|
|
|