|
ABSTRACT
Highly regular, nanodevice based architectures have been proposed to replace pure CMOS based architectures in the emerging post CMOS era. Since bottom-up self-assembly is used to build these architectures, regular nanowire crossbars are emerging as a promising candidate. While these regular structures resemble CMOS programmable logic arrays (PLAs), PLA logic synthesis methodologies fail to solve the associated problems since the length and connectivity constraints imposed by individual nanowires in these crossbars translate into challenges hitherto not considered. These strict topological constraints should be considered while mapping Boolean functions onto nanowire crossbars during logic synthesis. We develop a mathematical model for this problem, an algorithm to solve it and three heuristics to improve the algorithm runtime.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
European Commission, Technology Roadmap for Nanoelectronics, 2001.
|
| |
2
|
ITRS, International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors Emerging Research Devices, 2004.
|
| |
3
|
M. S. Montemerlo, J. C. Love, G. J. Opitech, D. G. Gordon and J. C. Ellenbogen, Technologies and Designs for Electronic Nanocomputers, MITRE, July 1996.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
P. J. Kuekes, D. R. Stewart and R. S. Williams, "The Crossbar Latch: Logic Value Storage, Restoration, and Inversion in Crossbar Circuits", Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 97, n. 3, pp. 034301, July 2005.
|
| |
6
|
A. DeHon, "Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics", IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 23--32, 2003.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
G. Snider and W. Robinett, "Crossbar Demultiplexers for Nano-electronics Based on n-Hot Codes", IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 4, pp. 249--254, 2005.
|
| |
9
|
C. P. Collier, E. W. Wong, M. Belohradsky, F. M. Raymo, J. F. Stoddart, P. J. Kuekes, R. S. Williams and J. R. Heath, "Electronically Configurable Molecular-Based Logic Gates", Science, vol. 285, pp. 391--394, July 1999.
|
| |
10
|
Y. Luo, C. P. Collier, J. O. Jeppesen, K. A. Nielsen, E. DeIonno, G. Ho, J. Perkins, H. Tseng, T. Yamamoto, J. F. Stoddart and J. R. Heath, "Two-Dimensional Molecular Electronics Circuits", ChemPhysChem, vol. 3, pp. 519--525, 2002.
|
| |
11
|
D. B. Strukov and K. K. Likharev, "CMOL FPGA: A Reconfigurable Architecture for Hybrid Digital Circuits with Two-terminal Nanodevices", Nanotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 888--900, Apr 2005.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
M. R. Stan, P. D. Franzon, S. C. Goldstein, J. C. Lach and M. M. Ziegler, "Molecular Electronics: From Devices and Interconnect to Circuits and Architecture", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, n. 11, pp. 1940--1957, November 2003.
|
| |
14
|
G. Snider, P. J. Kuekes and R. S. Williams, "CMOS-like Logic in Defective, Nanoscale Crossbars", Nanotechnology, vol. 15, pp. 881--891, Aug 2004.
|
| |
15
|
Collaborative Benchmarking Laboratory, 1993 LGSynth Bench-marks, North Carolina State University, Department of Computer Science, 1993.
|
|