ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Gate sizing: finFETs vs 32nm bulk MOSFETs
Full text PdfPdf (801 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 43rd annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Francisco, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 32: logic synthesis I table of contents
Pages: 528 - 531  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-381-6
Authors
Brian Swahn  Tufts University, Medford, MA
Soha Hassoun  Tufts University, Medford, MA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1146909.1147047
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

FinFET devices promise to replace traditional MOSFETs because of superior ability in controlling leakage and minimizing short channel effects while delivering a strong drive current. We investigate in this paper gate sizing of finFET devices, and we provide a comparison with 32nm bulk CMOS. Wider finFET devices are built utilizing multiple parallel fins between the source and drain. Independent gating of the finFET's double gates allows significant reduction in leakage current. We perform temperature-aware circuit optimization by modeling delay using temperature-dependent parameters, and by imposing constraints that limit the maximum allowable number of parallel fins. We show that finFET circuits are superior in performance and produce less static power when compared to 32nm circuits.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
GAMS Development Corp. "The Solver Manuals", 2005.
 
6
D. Fried, E. Nowak, J. Kedzierski, J. Dusterr, and K. Kornegay. "A Fin-Type Independent-Double-Gate NFET". Device Research Conference, pages 45--6, 2003.
 
7
 
8
SOI Group. "UFDG MOSFET Model (Ver. 3.1)". University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, 2006.
 
9
 
10
D. Hisamoto, W.-C. Lee, J. Kedzierski, E. Anderson, H. Takeuchi, K. Asano, T.-J. King, J. Bokor, and C. Hu. "A folded-channel MOSFET for deep-sub tenth micron era". International Electron Devices Meeting 1998. Technical Digest, pages 1032--4, 1998.
 
11
Y. Ju and K. Goodson. "Phonon Scattering in Silicon Films of Thickness Below 100 nm". Applied Physics Letters, 74:3005--7, 1999.
 
12
M. Lundstrom and Z. Ren. "Essential Physics of Carrier Transport in Nanoscale MOSFETs". IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, 49(1):133--41, January 2002.
13
 
14
"Predictive Technology Model (PTM), http://www.eas.asu.edu/~ptm", 2006.
 
15
 
16
J. Tschanz, J. Kao, S. Narendra, R. Nair, D. Antoniadis, A. Chandrakasan, and V. De. "Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37:1396, 2002.
 
17


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brian Swahn: colleagues
Soha Hassoun: colleagues