ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Generation of yield-aware Pareto surfaces for hierarchical circuit design space exploration
Full text PdfPdf (1.49 MB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 43rd annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Francisco, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 3: hierarchical synthesis for mixed-signal designs table of contents
Pages: 31 - 36  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-381-6
Authors
Saurabh K. Tiwary  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Pragati K. Tiwary  BIT Mesra, Jharkhand India
Rob A. Rutenbar  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1146909.1146921
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Pareto surfaces in the performance space determine the range of feasible performance values for a circuit topology in a given technology. We present a non-dominated sorting based global optimization algorithm to generate the nominal pareto front efficiently using a simulator-in-a-loop approach. The solutions on this pareto front combined with efficient Monte Carlo approximation ideas are then used to compute the yield-aware pareto fronts. We show experimental results for both the nominal and yield-aware pareto fronts for power and phase noise for a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) circuit. The presented methodology computes yield-aware pareto fronts in approximately 5-6 times the time required for a single circuit synthesis run and is thus practically efficient. We also show applications of yield-aware paretos to find the optimal VCO circuit to meet the system level specifications of a phase locked loop.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Spectre simulator from Cadence. http://www.cadence.com.
 
2
High-performance CMOS-amplifier design uses front-to-back analog flow. A. H. Shah and S. Dugalleix and F. Lemery, EDN, 2002.
 
3
E. Ochotta, R. Rutenbar, and L. Carley. Synthesis of high performance analog circuits in astrx/oblx. TCAD, 15:273--294, 1996.
 
4
K. T. Fang, K. Fang, and L. Runze. Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments. CRC Press, October 2005.
 
5
 
6
 
7
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. In Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, number 2, pages 182--197, April 2002.
 
8
K. Kundert. Predicting the phase noise and jitter of PLL based frequency synthesizers. http://www.designers-guide.org.
9
10
 
11
S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, (671--680), 1983.
12
 
13
S. K. Tiwary, S. Velu, R. A. Rutenbar, and T. Mukherjee. Pareto optimal modeling for efficient PLL optimization. In Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, Nanotech, pages 195--198, 2004.
 
14
G. Stehr, H. Graeb, and K. Antreich. Feasibility regions and their significance to the hierarchical optimization of analog and mixedsignal systems. In Intl. Series of Numerical Mathematics, pages 167--184, 2003.
15
 
16
T. K. Ogawa and K. Kundert. VCO jitter simulation and its comparision with measurements. In ASP-DAC, Jan. 1999.
 
17
 
18
 
19

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Saurabh K. Tiwary: colleagues
Pragati K. Tiwary: colleagues
Rob A. Rutenbar: colleagues