CLOS: integrating object-oriented and functional programming

ABSTRACT

Lisp has a long history as a functional language,* where action is invoked by calling a procedure, and where procedural abstraction and encapsulation provide convenient modularity boundaries. A number of attempts have been made to graft object-oriented programming into this framework without losing the essential character of Lisp—to include the benefits of data abstraction, extensible type classification, incremental operator definition, and code reuse through an inheritance hierarchy. The Common Lisp Object System (CLOS) [3], a result of the ANSI standardization process for Common Lisp, represents a marriage of these two traditions. This article explores the landscape in which the major object-oriented facilities exist, showing how the CLOS solution is effective within the two contexts.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bennett, J., Dawes, J., Hastings, R. Cleaning CLOS Applications with the MOP. Paper presented at the Second CLOS Users and lmplementors Workshop, OOPSLA 1989 (Oct. 1989).
• 2: Bobrow, D.G. and Stefik M. The LOOPS Manual. Xerox Paio Alto Research Center, 1983.
• 3: Daniel G. Bobrow , Linda G. DeMichiel , Richard P. Gabriel , Sonya E. Keene , Gregor Kiczales , David A. Moon, Common Lisp Object System specification, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.23 n.SI, p.1-142, September 1988 [doi>10.1145/885631.885632]
• 4: Luca Cardelli , Peter Wegner, On understanding types, data abstraction, and polymorphism, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.17 n.4, p.471-523, Dec. 1985 [doi>10.1145/6041.6042]
• 5: W. F. Clocksin , Christopher S. Mellish, Programming in Prolog (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 6: R. Ducournau , M. Habib, On some algorithms for multiple inheritance in object-oriented programming, European conference on object-oriented programming on ECOOP '87, p.243-252, October 1987, Paris, France
• 7: Gabriel, R.P., Bourbaki, N., Devin, M., Dussud, P., Gray, D. and Sexton, H. Foundation for a C + + programming environment. In Proceedings of C+ + at Work (Sept. 1990).
• 8: Adele Goldberg , David Robson, Smalltalk-80: the language and its implementation, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1983
• 9: Daniel H. H. Ingalls, A simple technique for handling multiple polymorphism, Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, p.347-349, September 29-October 02, 1986, Portland, Oregon, United States
• 10: Gregor Kiczales , Jim des Rivières , Daniel G. Bobrow, The art of metaobject protocol, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
• 11: Bent Bruun Kristensen , Ole Lehrmann Madsen , Birger Moller-Pedersen , Kristen Nygaard, The BETA programming language, Research directions in object-oriented programming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
• 12: Guy L. Steele, Jr., Common LISP: the language (2nd ed.), Digital Press, Newton, MA, 1990
• 13: Symbolics, Inc. Symbolics Common Lisp--Lang'uage Concepts, Chapter 19 "Flavors," Symbolics, Inc., Burlington Mass., 1988.
• 14: David Ungar , Randall B. Smith, Self: The power of simplicity, Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, p.227-242, October 04-08, 1987, Orlando, Florida, United States
• 15: Peter Wegner, Dimensions of object-based language design, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.22 n.12, p.168-182, Dec. 1987

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
      D.3.2 Language Classifications

          Nouns: Common Lisp

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.1 PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES
      D.1.1 Applicative (Functional) Programming
      D.1.5 Object-oriented Programming

General Terms:
Languages

Keywords:
Common Lisp Object Systems