Using natural language processing to improve eRulemaking

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Using natural language processing to improve eRulemaking: project highlight

Full text

Pdf (81 KB)

Source

dg.o; Vol. 151 archive
Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research table of contents

San Diego, California

SESSION: E-Rulemaking 1 table of contents

Pages: 177 - 178

Year of Publication: 2006

Authors

Claire Cardie	Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Cynthia Farina	Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Thomas Bruce	Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Sponsor

NSF : National Science Foundation

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 41, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1146598.1146651 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes in brief Cornell's interdisciplinary eRulemaking project that was recently funded (December, 2005) by the National Science Foundation.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	C. Cardie, J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, and D. Litman. Low-level annotations and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering. In M. Maybury, editor, New Directions in Question Answering. 2004.
	2	Y. Choi, C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. Identifying Sources of Opinions with Conditional Random Fields and Extraction Patterns. In HLT-EMNLP 2005, 2005.
	3	C. Coglianese. The state of rulemaking in the federal government. Technical report, Transcript Panel 6, 2005.
	4	Bonnie Kaplan , Dennis Duchon, “Combining qualitative and quantitative methods information systems research: a case study", Management Information Systems Quarterly, v.12 n.4, p.571-586, December 1988 [doi>10.2307/249133]
	5	C. Kerwin. The state of rulemaking conference. Technical report, Transcript Panel 1 and 6, 2003.
	6	C. Kerwin. The state of rulemaking in the federal government. Technical report, Transcript Panel 1, 2005.
	7	T. O. McGarity. The Expanded Debate Over the Future of the Regulatory State. 63 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1463, 1523. 1996.
	8	Bo Pang , Lillian Lee , Shivakumar Vaithyanathan, Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques, Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing, p.79-86, July 06, 2002 [doi>10.3115/1118693.1118704]
	9	M. Seidenfeld. A Table of Requirements for Federal Administrative Rulemaking. 27 Fla. S. U. L. Rev. 533, 535. 2000.
	10	P. Strauss, T. Rakoff, and C. Farina. Administrative Law. 10th edition, 2003.
	11	L. Zhou and E. Hovy. Digesting virtual "geek" culture: The summarization of technical internet relay chats. In ACL-2005, 2005.