ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Flooding and recycling authorizations
Full text PdfPdf (1.82 MB)
Source New Security Paradigms Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on New security paradigms table of contents
Lake Arrowhead, California
SESSION: Managing authority table of contents
Pages: 67 - 72  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-317-4
Author
Konstantin (Kosta) Beznosov  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Sponsor
ACSA : Applied Computer Security Associates
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1146269.1146285
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The request-response paradigm used for access control solutions commonly leads to point-to-point (PTP) architectures, with security enforcement logic obtaining decisions from authorization servers through remote procedure calls. In massive-scale and complex enterprises, PTP authorization architectures result in fragile and inefficient solutions. They also fail to exploit virtually free CPU resources and network bandwidth. This paper proposes leveraging publish-subscribe architectures for increased reliability and efficiency by flooding delivery channels with speculatively pre-computed authorizations and actively recycling them on a just-in-time basis.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Beznosov, Recycling Authorizations: Toward Secondary and Approximate Authorizations Model (SAAM), LERSSE-TR-2005-01, LERSSE, Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Engineering, University of British Columbia, March 2005.
 
2
 
3
Brewer, D., and Nash, M. "The Chinese Wall security policy," in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 206--214, May 1989.
 
4
J. Crampton (private communication), 2005.
 
5
Entrust Inc., GetAccess Design and Administration Guide, September 20, 1999.
 
6
James Gwertzman and Margo I. Seltzer, "World wide web cache consistency," in USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 141--152, 1996.
7
 
8
W. Leung and J. Crampton and K. Beznosov, Toward Secondary and Approximate Authorizations Model (SAAM), technical report, LERSSE, Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Engineering, University of British Columbia, in progress.
 
9
 
10
M. Nash and L. Poland. "Some conundrums concerning separation of duty," in Proceedings of the Symposium on Security and Privacy, (Oakland, CA, May 1990), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 201--207.
 
11
Netegrity Inc., SiteMinder Concepts Guide, 2000.
12
 
13
14
 
15
A. Rosenthal and E. Sciore, "View Security as the Basis for Data Warehouse Security," in Proceedings of International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses, 2000.
 
16
 
17
Securant, Unified Access Management: A Model For Integrated Web Security, Securant Technologies, June 25, 1999.
 
18
 
19
W. Vogels, How Wrong Can You Be? Getting Lost on the Road to Massive Scalability, keynote speech at International Middleware Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2004.
 
20
C. Weissman. Security controls in the ADEPT-50 timesharing system. In AFIPS Conference Proceedings, v. 35, pp. 119--133. FJCC, 1969.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Konstantin (Kosta) Beznosov: colleagues