ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A computational efficient covariance matrix update and a (1+1)-CMA for evolution strategies
Full text PdfPdf (331 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Evolution strategies, evolutionary programming: papers table of contents
Pages: 453 - 460  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
Authors
Christian Igel  Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Thorsten Suttorp  Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Nikolaus Hansen  Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143997.1144082
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

First, the covariance matrix adaptation (CMA) with rank-one update is introduced into the (1+1)-evolution strategy. An improved implementation of the 1/5-th success rule is proposed for step size adaptation, which replaces cumulative path length control. Second, an incremental Cholesky update for the covariance matrix is developed replacing the computational demanding and numerically involved decomposition of the covariance matrix. The Cholesky update can replace the decomposition only for the update without evolution path and reduces the computational effort from O(n3) to O(n2). The resulting (1+1)-Cholesky-CMA-ES is an elegant algorithm and the perhaps simplest evolution strategy with covariance matrix and step size adaptation. Simulations compare the introduced algorithms to previously published CMA versions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
N. Hansen. An analysis of mutative σ-self-adaptation on linear fitness functions. Evolutionary Computation, 14(3), 2006.
 
6
N. Hansen and S. Kern. Evaluating the CMA evolution strategy on multimodal test functions. In X. Yao, E. Burke, J. A. Lozano, J. Smith, J. J. Merelo-Guervós, J. A. Bullinaria, J. Rowe, P. Tivño, A. Kabán, and H.-P. Schwefel, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VIII), volume 3242 of LNCS, pages 282--291. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
 
7
 
8
N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '96), pages 312--317, 1996.
 
9
 
10
 
11
H. Mühlenbein, D. Schomisch, and J. Born. The Parallel Genetic Algorithm as Function Optimizer. Parallel Computing, 17(6-7):619--632, 1991.
 
12
I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie: Optimierung Technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der Biologischen Evolution. Frommann-Holzboog, 1973.
 
13
G. Rudolph. On correlated mutations in evolution strategies. In R. Männer and B. Manderick, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2 (PPSN II), pages 105--114. Elsevier, 1992.
 
14
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Christian Igel: colleagues
Thorsten Suttorp: colleagues
Nikolaus Hansen: colleagues