| A computational efficient covariance matrix update and a (1+1)-CMA for evolution strategies |
| Full text |
Pdf
(331 KB)
|
| Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Evolution strategies, evolutionary programming: papers
table of contents
Pages: 453 - 460
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 48, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
First, the covariance matrix adaptation (CMA) with rank-one update is introduced into the (1+1)-evolution strategy. An improved implementation of the 1/5-th success rule is proposed for step size adaptation, which replaces cumulative path length control. Second, an incremental Cholesky update for the covariance matrix is developed replacing the computational demanding and numerically involved decomposition of the covariance matrix. The Cholesky update can replace the decomposition only for the update without evolution path and reduces the computational effort from O(n3) to O(n2). The resulting (1+1)-Cholesky-CMA-ES is an elegant algorithm and the perhaps simplest evolution strategy with covariance matrix and step size adaptation. Simulations compare the introduced algorithms to previously published CMA versions.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
N. Hansen. An analysis of mutative σ-self-adaptation on linear fitness functions. Evolutionary Computation, 14(3), 2006.
|
| |
6
|
N. Hansen and S. Kern. Evaluating the CMA evolution strategy on multimodal test functions. In X. Yao, E. Burke, J. A. Lozano, J. Smith, J. J. Merelo-Guervós, J. A. Bullinaria, J. Rowe, P. Tivño, A. Kabán, and H.-P. Schwefel, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VIII), volume 3242 of LNCS, pages 282--291. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '96), pages 312--317, 1996.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Stefan Kern , Sibylle D. Müller , Nikolaus Hansen , Dirk Büche , Jiri Ocenasek , Petros Koumoutsakos, Learning probability distributions in continuous evolutionary algorithms– a comparative review, Natural Computing: an international journal, v.3 n.1, p.77-112, 2004
[doi> 10.1023/B:NACO.0000023416.59689.4e]
|
| |
11
|
H. Mühlenbein, D. Schomisch, and J. Born. The Parallel Genetic Algorithm as Function Optimizer. Parallel Computing, 17(6-7):619--632, 1991.
|
| |
12
|
I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie: Optimierung Technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der Biologischen Evolution. Frommann-Holzboog, 1973.
|
| |
13
|
G. Rudolph. On correlated mutations in evolution strategies. In R. Männer and B. Manderick, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2 (PPSN II), pages 105--114. Elsevier, 1992.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian L. Mueller , Benedikt Baumgartner , Georg Ofenbeck , Birte Schrader , Ivo F. Sbalzarini, pCMALib: a parallel fortran 90 library for the evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation, Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, July 08-12, 2009, Montreal, Québec, Canada
|
|
|
|
|