ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimising cancer chemotherapy using an estimation of distribution algorithm and genetic algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (134 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Estimation of distribution algorithms: papers table of contents
Pages: 413 - 418  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
Authors
Andrei Petrovski  The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
Siddhartha Shakya  The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
John McCall  The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143997.1144073
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a methodology for using heuristic search methods to optimise cancer chemotherapy. Specifically, two evolutionary algorithms - Population Based Incremental Learning (PBIL), which is an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm (EDA), and Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have been applied to the problem of finding effective chemotherapeutic treatments. To our knowledge, EDAs have been applied to fewer real world problems compared to GAs, and the aim of the present paper is to expand the application domain of this technique.We compare and analyse the performance of both algorithms and draw a conclusion as to which approach to cancer chemotherapy optimisation is more efficient and helpful in the decision-making activity led by the oncologists.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Aickelin and J. Li. An Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Nurse Scheduling. Annals of Operational Research, in print, 2006.
 
2
 
3
 
4
J. Cassidy and H. McLeod. Is it possible to design a logical development plan for an anti-cancer drug? Pharmaceutical Medicine, 9:95--103, 1995.
 
5
D. Dearnaly, I. Judson, and T. Root, editors. Handbook of adult cancer chemotherapy schedules. The Medicine Group (Education) Ltd., Oxfordshire, 1995.
 
6
R. Fletcher and S. Leyffer. Numerical experience with solving mpecs as nlps. Technical Report NA/210, Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee, UK, 2002.
 
7
 
8
 
9
G. R. Harik, F. G. Lobo, and D. E. Goldberg. The compact genetic algorithm. IEEE-EC, 3(4):287, November 1999.
 
10
 
11
I. Inza, M. Merino, P. Larrañaga, J. Quiroga, B. Sierra, and M. Girala. Feature subset selection by population-based incremental learning. A case study in the survival of cirrhotic patients with TIPS. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, In press, 2001.
 
12
 
13
R. Martin and K. Teo. Optimal control of drug administration in cancer chemotherapy. World Scientific, 1994.
 
14
J. McCall and A. Petrovski. A decision support system for cancer chemotherapy using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, pages 65--70. IOS Press, 1999.
 
15
16
 
17
A. Petrovski. An Application of Genetic Algorithms to Chemotherapy Treatment. PhD thesis, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK, 1999.
 
18
A. Petrovski, A. Brownlee, and J. McCall. Statistical optimisation and tuning of GA factors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages Vol. 1, 758--764, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005. IEEE Press.
 
19
 
20
A. Petrovski, B. Sudha, and J. McCall. Optimising cancer chemotherapy using particle swarm optimisation and genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pages 633--641, Birmingham, UK, 2004. Springer: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3224.
 
21
R. Sanatana, P. Larrañaga, and J. Lozano. Interactions and dependencies in estimation of distribution algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 2, pages 1418--1425, Edinburgh, UK, 2005. IEEE press.
 
22
R. Sanatana, P. Larrañaga, and J. Lozano. Protein structure prediction in simplified models with estimation of distribution algorithms. In Proceedings of the IV Congreso Espanol sobre Metaheuristicas, Algoritmos Evolutivos y Bioinspirados (MAEB-2005), pages 245--252, Granada, Spain, 2005.
23
 
24
S. K. Shakya, J. A. W. McCall, and D. F. Brown. Updating the probability vector using MRF technique for a Univariate EDA. In E. Onaindia and S. Staab, editors, Proceedings of the Second Starting AI Researchers' Symposium, pages 15--25, Valencia, Spain, 2004. IOS press.
 
25
K. C. Tan, E. F. Khor, J. Cai, C. M. Heng, and T. H. Lee. Automating the drug scheduling of cancer chemotherapy via evolutionary computation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, pages 169--185, 2002.
 
26
M. Villasana and G. Ochoa. Heuristic design of cancer chemotherapies. IEEE Transactions on Evolutonary Computation, 8(6):513--521, December 2004.
 
27
T. Wheldon. Mathematical models in cancer research. Adam Hilger, Bristol, Philadelphia, 1988.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrei Petrovski: colleagues
Siddhartha Shakya: colleagues
John McCall: colleagues