| A game-theoretic investigation of selection methods in two-population coevolution |
| Full text |
Pdf
(655 KB)
|
| Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Coevolution: papers
table of contents
Pages: 321 - 328
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
|
|
Author
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 38, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We examine the dynamical and game-theoretic properties of several selection methods in the context of two-population coevolution. The methods we examine are fitness-proportional, linear rank, truncation, and (μ,λ)-ES selection. We use simple symmetric variable-sum games in an evolutionary game-theoretic framework. Our results indicate that linear rank, truncation, and (μ,λ)-ES selection are somewhat better-behaved in a two-population setting than in the one-population case analyzed by Ficici et al. [4]. These alternative selection methods maintain the Nash-equilibrium attractors found in proportional selection, but also add non-Nash attractors as well as regions of phase-space that lead to cyclic dynamics. Thus, these alternative selection methods do not properly implement the Nash-equilibrium solution concept.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, 1984.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
S. G. Ficici, O. Melnik, and J. B. Pollack. A game-theoretic and dynamical-systems analysis of selection methods in coevolution. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9(6):580--602, 2005.
|
| |
5
|
D. B. Fogel. An overview of evolutionary programming. In L. D. Davis, K. De Jong, M. D. Vose, and L. D. Whitley, editors, Evolutionary Algorithms, pages 89--109. Springer, 1997.
|
| |
6
|
D. B. Fogel and G. B. Fogel. Evolutionary stable strategies are not always stable under evolutionary dynamics. In J. R. McDonnell, R. G. Reynolds, and D. B. Fogel, editors, Evolutionary Programming IV: The Proceedings of Fourth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, pages 565--577. MIT Press, 1995.
|
| |
7
|
D. Fudenberg and D. K. Levine. The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT Press, 1998.
|
| |
8
|
D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. Game Theory. MIT Press, 1998.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
|
| |
11
|
J. Maynard Smith. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
|
| |
12
|
|
|