ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Local Fisher discriminant analysis for supervised dimensionality reduction
Full text PdfPdf (295 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 148 archive
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 905 - 912  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-383-2
Author
Masashi Sugiyama  Tokyo Institute of Technology, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 34,   Downloads (12 Months): 104,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143958
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Dimensionality reduction is one of the important preprocessing steps in high-dimensional data analysis. In this paper, we consider the supervised dimensionality reduction problem where samples are accompanied with class labels. Traditional Fisher discriminant analysis is a popular and powerful method for this purpose. However, it tends to give undesired results if samples in some class form several separate clusters, i.e., multimodal. In this paper, we propose a new dimensionality reduction method called local Fisher discriminant analysis (LFDA), which is a localized variant of Fisher discriminant analysis. LFDA takes local structure of the data into account so the multimodal data can be embedded appropriately. We also show that LFDA can be extended to non-linear dimensionality reduction scenarios by the kernel trick.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179--188.
 
3
 
4
Globerson, A., & Roweis, S. (2006). Metric learning by collapsing classes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18 (pp. 451--458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
5
Goldberger, J., Roweis, S., Hinton, G., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2005). Neighbourhood components analysis. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss and L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 17, 513--520. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
6
He, X., & Niyogi, P. (2004). Locality preserving projections. In S. Thrun, L. Saul and B. Schöölkopf (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
7
 
8
Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
9
Zelnik-Manor, L., & Perona, P. (2005). Self-tuning spectral clustering. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss and L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 17, 1601--1608. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CITED BY  9