ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Local distance preservation in the GP-LVM through back constraints
Full text PdfPdf (615 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 148 archive
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 513 - 520  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-383-2
Authors
Neil D. Lawrence  University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K.
Joaquin Quiñonero-Candela  Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143909
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-LVM) is a generative approach to nonlinear low dimensional embedding, that provides a smooth probabilistic mapping from latent to data space. It is also a non-linear generalization of probabilistic PCA (PPCA) (Tipping & Bishop, 1999). While most approaches to non-linear dimensionality methods focus on preserving local distances in data space, the GP-LVM focusses on exactly the opposite. Being a smooth mapping from latent to data space, it focusses on keeping things apart in latent space that are far apart in data space. In this paper we first provide an overview of dimensionality reduction techniques, placing the emphasis on the kind of distance relation preserved. We then show how the GP-LVM can be generalized, through back constraints, to additionally preserve local distances. We give illustrative experiments on common data sets.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bilmes, J., Malkin, J., Li, X., Harada, S., Kilanski, K., Kirchhoff, K., Wright, R., Subramanya, A., Landay, J., Dowden, P., & Chizeck, H. (2006). The vocal joystick. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE. To appear.
 
2
3
 
4
Hinton, G., & Roweis, S. (2003). Stochastic neighbor embedding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
5
Hinton, G. E., Dayan, P., Frey, B. J., & Neal, R. M. (1995). The wake-sleep algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science, 268, 1158--1161.
 
6
Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
 
7
Lawrence, N. D. (2004). Gaussian process models for visualisation of high dimensional data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 329--336). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
8
Lawrence, N. D. (2005). Probabilistic non-linear principal component analysis with Gaussian process latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 1783--1816.
 
9
Lowe, D., & Tipping, M. E. (1996). Feed-forward neural networks and topographic mappings for exploratory data analysis. Neural Computing and Applications, 4.
 
10
MacKay, D. J. C. (1995). Bayesian neural networks and density networks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A, 354, 73--80.
 
11
Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.
 
12
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290, 2323--2326.
 
13
Sammon, J. W. (1969). A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-18, 401--409.
 
14
 
15
Shon, A. P., Grochow, K., Hertzmann, A., & Rao, R. P. N. (2006). Learning shared latent structure for image synthesis and robotic imitation. In (Weiss et al., 2006).
 
16
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. d., & Langford, J. C. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319--2323.
 
17
Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999). Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 6, 611--622.
 
18
 
19
Wang, J. M., Fleet, D. J., & Hertzmann, A. (2006). Gaussian process dynamical models. In (Weiss et al., 2006).
20
 
21
Weiss, Y., Schölkopf, B., & Platt, J. C. (Eds.). (2006). Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22


Collaborative Colleagues:
Neil D. Lawrence: colleagues
Joaquin Quiñonero-Candela: colleagues