ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Collaborative prediction using ensembles of Maximum Margin Matrix Factorizations
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 148 archive
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 249 - 256  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-383-2
Author
Dennis DeCoste  Yahoo! Research, Burbank, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143876
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Fast gradient-based methods for Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization (MMMF) were recently shown to have great promise (Rennie & Srebro, 2005), including significantly outperforming the previous state-of-the-art methods on some standard collaborative prediction benchmarks (including MovieLens). In this paper, we investigate ways to further improve the performance of MMMF, by casting it within an ensemble approach. We explore and evaluate a variety of alternative ways to define such ensembles. We show that our resulting ensembles can perform significantly better than a single MMMF model, along multiple evaluation metrics. In fact, we find that ensembles of partially trained MMMF models can sometimes even give better predictions in total training time comparable to a single MMMF model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Claypool, M., Gokhale, A., Miranda, T., Murnikov, P., Netes, D., & Sartin, M. (1999). Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems.
 
3
Derbeko, P., El-Yaniv, R., & Meir, R. (2002). Variance optimized bagging.
 
4
 
5
Harrington, E., Herbrich, R., Kivinen, J., Platt, J. C., & Williamson, R. C. (2003). Online bayes point machines. Seventh Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 241--252).
6
 
7
Lee, D., & Seung, H. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401, 788--791.
 
8
Marlin, B. (2004). Collaborative filtering: A machine learning perspective. Master's thesis, University of Toronto.
9
 
10
 
11
Platt, J. C. (1999). Probabilities for support vector machines. In B. S. D. S. A. Smola (Ed.), Advances in large margin classifiers, 61--74. MIT Press.
 
12
Rennie, J. D. M. (2006). Personal Communication.
13
 
14
Srebro, N., Rennie, J. D. M., & Jaakola, T. S. (2005). Maximum-margin matrix factorization. NIPS.
 
15