Radio propagation patterns in wireless sensor networks: new experimental results

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensors use low power radio transceivers due to the stringent constraints on battery capacity. As a result, radio transmission with wireless sensors is unreliable. Further, propagation patterns are irregular, causing some links to be asymmetric. Accurate models of radio propagation patterns are important for protocol design and simulation. Thus far, measurements of radio propagation patterns have been carried out using the motes themselves for test measurement. We have carried out experiments using RF test equipment to precisely measure mote transmit and receive signal strength and to accurately determine propagation patterns. Our tests have produced new radio propagation patterns and a new propagation model. Our model is more accurate than previous models and can be used for building both analytical and simulation models for wireless sensor networks.

REFERENCES

• 1: I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, "A Survey on Sensor Networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 40, No. 8, August 2002, pp. 102--114.
• 2: J. Bardwell, "You Believe You Understand What You Think I Said: The Truth about 802.11 Signal and Noise Metrics," http://www.connect802.com/download/techpubs/2004/you_believe_D100201.pdf, 2004
• 3: V. Bhavsar, N. Blas, and H. Nguyen, "Measurement of Antenna Radiation Patterns - Laboratory Manual," UC-Riverside, 2000.
• 4: Crossbow Technology Inc., http://www.xbow.com, Accessed in February 2005.
• 5: David E. Culler , Jason Hill , Philip Buonadonna , Robert Szewczyk , Alec Woo, A Network-Centric Approach to Embedded Software for Tiny Devices, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Embedded Software, p.114-130, October 08-10, 2001
• 6: Tian He , Chengdu Huang , Brian M. Blum , John A. Stankovic , Tarek Abdelzaher, Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks, Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, September 14-19, 2003, San Diego, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/938985.938995]
• 7: IFR 120B Data Sheet, http://www.testmart.com/ Accessed in November 2005.
• 8: J. M. Kahn , R. H. Katz , K. S. J. Pister, Next century challenges: mobile networking for “Smart Dust”, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.271-278, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/313451.313558]
• 9: Alan Mainwaring , David Culler , Joseph Polastre , Robert Szewczyk , John Anderson, Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring, Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications, September 28-28, 2002, Atlanta, Georgia, USA [doi>10.1145/570738.570751]
• 10: Tereus Scott, "Mica Mote Antenna Radiation Pattern Analysis," Technical Report DCS-303-IR, Computer Science Department, University of Victoria, http://www.cs.uvic.ca/~wkui/research/motereport-p.pdf, August 2004.
• 11: Tescom TC-5060B UHF TEM Cell, http://www.temcell.com/tc5060.html, Accessed in November 2005.
• 12: Brett Warneke , Matt Last , Brian Liebowitz , Kristofer S. J. Pister, Smart Dust: Communicating with a Cubic-Millimeter Computer, Computer, v.34 n.1, p.44-51, January 2001 [doi>10.1109/2.963443]
• 13: Gang Zhou , Tian He , Sudha Krishnamurthy , John A. Stankovic, Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, June 06-09, 2004, Boston, MA, USA [doi>10.1145/990064.990081]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  B. Hardware
  B.4 INPUT/OUTPUT AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS
      B.4.5 Reliability, Testing, and Fault-Tolerance**

General Terms:
Experimentation, Verification

Keywords:
radio propagation pattern, wireless sensors