|
ABSTRACT
The link structure of the Web can be viewed as a massive graph. The preferential attachment model and its variants are well-known random graph models that help explain the evolution of the web graph. However, those models assign more links to older pages without reference to the quality of web pages, which does not capture the real-world evolution of the web graph and renders the models inappropriate for studying the popularity evolution of new pages.We extend the preferential attachment model with page quality, where the probability of a page getting new links depends not only on its current degree but also on its quality. We study the distribution of degrees among different quality values, and prove that under discrete quality distributions, the degree sequence still follows a power law distribution. Then we use the model to study the evolution of page popularity. We show that for pages with the same quality, the older pages are more popular; if a younger page is better than an older page, then eventually the younger-and-better page will become more popular. We also use the model to study a randomized ranking scheme proposed earlier [18] and show that it accelerates popularity evolution of new pages.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
A-L. Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(15), pp. 509--512, 1999.
|
| |
2
|
G.Bianconi and A-L. Barabasi. Competition and Multiscaling in evolving Networks. Europhysics Letters, 54(4), pp. 436--442, 2001.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
S. Brin, R. Motwani, L. Page, and T. Winograd. What can you do with a Web in your Pocket? Data Engineering Bulletin, 21: 37--47, 1998.
|
| |
5
|
B. Bollobas and O. Riordan. Robustness and vulnerability of scale-free random graphs. Internet Mathematics, 1: 1--35, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
C. Cooper, A. Frieze and J. Vera. Random deletion in a scale-free random graph process. Internet Mathematics, 1: 463--483, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
E. Drinea, M. Enachescu and M. Mitzenmacher. Variations on random graph models of the Web. Harvard Computer Science Technical Report TR-06-01.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
J. Kleinberg, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan and A.S. Tomkins. The Web as a Graph: measurements, models and methods. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, 1999.
|
| |
14
|
R. Kumar , P. Raghavan , S. Rajagopalan , D. Sivakumar , A. Tomkins , E. Upfal, Stochastic models for the Web graph, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, p.57, November 12-14, 2000
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report, Stanford Digital Libraries, 1998.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
Sandeep Pandey , Sourashis Roy , Christopher Olston , Junghoo Cho , Soumen Chakrabarti, Shuffling a stacked deck: the case for partially randomized ranking of search engine results, Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Very large data bases, August 30-September 02, 2005, Trondheim, Norway
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Christian Borgs , Jennifer Chayes , Constantinos Daskalakis , Sebastien Roch, First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness, Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, June 11-13, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
|
|
|
|
|