| Analyzing workflows implied by instance-dependent access rules |
| Full text |
Pdf
(429 KB)
|
| Source
|
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fifth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Analysis of queries and workflows
table of contents
Pages: 100 - 109
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-318-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Recently proposed form-based web information systems liberate the capture and reuse of data in organizations by substituting the development of technical implementations of electronic forms for the conceptual modelling of forms' tree-structured schemas and their data access rules. Significantly, these instance-dependent rules also imply a workflow process associated to a form, eliminating the need for a costly workflow design phase. Instead, the workflows thus created in an ad hoc manner by unsophisticated end-users can be automatically analyzed, and incorrect forms rejected.This paper examines fundamental correctness properties of workflows that are implied by instance-dependent access rules. Specifically, we study the decidability of the form completability property and the semi-soundness of a form's workflow. These problems are affected by a choice of constraints on the path language used to express access rules and completion formulas, and on the depth of the form's schema tree. Hence, we study these problems by examining them in the context of several different fragments determined by such constraints.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Microsoft Office InfoPath, 2003, http://www.microsoft.com/office/infopath/prodinfo/default.mspx.
|
| |
2
|
J. Boyer, D. Landwehr, R. Merrick, T. Raman, M. Dubinko, and L. Klotz, XForms 1.0 (second edition), W3C Recommendation, March 2006, http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
S. Dekeyser, J. Hidders, R. Watson, and R. Addie, Peer-to-peer form based web information systems, ADC 2006 (Hobart, Tasmania, Australia) (Gill Dobbie and James Bailey, eds.), Australian Computer Society, Inc., January 2006.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Jan Hidders , Marlon Dumas , Wil M. P. van der Aalst , Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede , Jan Verelst, When are two workflows the same?, Proceedings of the 2005 Australasian symposium on Theory of computing, p.3-11, January 01, 2005, Newcastle, Australia
|
| |
7
|
Hajo A. Reijers, Selma Limam, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Product-based workflow design, Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (2003), no. 1, 229--262.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
W. van der Aalst, The application of petri nets to workflow management, Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers 8 (1998), no. 1, 21--66.
|
| |
10
|
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Stijn Dekeyser , Richard Watson , Lasse Motrøen, A model, schema, and interface for metadata file systems, Proceedings of the thirty-first Australasian conference on Computer science, January 01-01, 2008, Wollongong, Australia
|
|
|
Kees van Hee , Jan Hidders , Geert-Jan Houben , Jan Paredaens , Philippe Thiran, On the relationship between workflow models and document types, Information Systems, v.34 n.1, p.178-208, March, 2009
|
|