| LVS verification across multiple power domains for a quad-core microprocessor |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.18 MB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)
archive
Volume 11 , Issue 2 (April 2006)
table of contents
Pages: 490 - 500
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1084-4309
|
|
Authors
|
|
Wei Li
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Daniel Blakely
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Scott Van Sooy
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Keven Dunn
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
David Kidd
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Robert Rogenmoser
|
Broadcom Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Dian Zhou
|
University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 54, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A unique LVS (layout-versus-schematic) methodology has been developed for the verification of a four-core microprocessor with multiple power domains using a triple-well 90-nm CMOS technology. The chip is migrated from its previous generation that is for a twin-well process. Due to the design reuse, VDD and GND are designed as global nets but they are not globally connected across the entire chip. The standard LVS flow is unable to handle the additional design complexity and there seems to be no published literature tackling the problem. This paper presents a two-phase LVS methodology: a standard LVS phase where power and ground nets are defined as global nets and a multi-power-domain LVS phase where power and ground nets are treated as local nets. The first phase involves verifying LVS at the block level as well as the full-chip level. The second phase aims at verifying the integrity of the multi-power-domain power grid that is not covered in the first phase LVS. The proposed LVS methodology was successfully verified by real silicon.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
David M. Brooks , Pradip Bose , Stanley E. Schuster , Hans Jacobson , Prabhakar N. Kudva , Alper Buyuktosunoglu , John-David Wellman , Victor Zyuban , Manish Gupta , Peter W. Cook, Power-Aware Microarchitecture: Design and Modeling Challenges for Next-Generation Microprocessors, IEEE Micro, v.20 n.6, p.26-44, November 2000
[doi> 10.1109/40.888701]
|
| |
2
|
HERCULES User's Reference Manual 2003. Synopsys Inc.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Kam, T., Rawat, S., Kirkpatrick, D., Roy, R., Spirakis, G. S., Sherwani, N., and Peterson, C. 2000. EDA challenges facing future microprocessor design. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aid. Des. Integ. Circ. Syst. 19, 12, 1498--1506.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Moll, L. 2004. The next-generation line of Broadcom's SiByte#8482; multiprocessor SoCs. In Proceedings of the Fall Microprocessor Forum (San Jose, CA, Oct.).
|
| |
7
|
Sano, B. 2002. Chip combines four 1GHZ cores. In Microprocessor Report.
|
|