Learning from artifacts

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Learning from artifacts: metadata utilization analysis

Full text

Pdf (184 KB)

Source

International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents

Chapel Hill, NC, USA

SESSION: Metadata in action table of contents

Pages: 270 - 271

Year of Publication: 2006

ISBN:1-59593-354-9

Authors

William E. Moen	University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
Shawne D. Miksa	University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
Amy Eklund	University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
Serhiy Polyakov	University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
Gregory Snyder	University of North Texas, Denton, Texas

Sponsors

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 28, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141753.1141813 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Describes the MARC Content Designation Utilization Project, which is examining a very large set of metadata records as artifacts of the library cataloging enterprise. This is the first large-scale examination of descriptive metadata utilization. Presents an overview of study activities and suggests the study's significance to the broader use of metadata in digital libraries.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Benardino, Penelope, and Moen, W.E. Assessing Metadata Utilization: An Analysis of MARC Content Designation Use. In 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Application (Seattle, WA, September 28-October 2, 2003). Seattle, Information School of the University of Washington, 2003. <http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/502_Paper58.pdf>
	2	The MARC Content Designation Utilization Project. 2005. <http://www.mcdu.unt.edu/>
	3	Library of Congress. MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data. Washington D.C., Cataloging Distribution Service, 1999.
	4	Moen, W.E., et al. Format Content Designation Analysis: Data Report. Frequency Counts for Books, Pamphlets, and Printed Sheets Records Created by OCLC Member Libraries (Set 01_B_nonLC). 2005. <http://www.mcdu.unt.edu/wp-content/FANDRFreqCount01BnonLCwemFinal20Dec2005.pdf>
	5	IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, International Federation of Library Associations. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. 1998. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/finalreport.htm>
	6	Delsey, Thomas J. Functional Analysis of the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Holdings Formats. Commissioned by the Network Development and MARC Standards Office at the Library of Congress. 2001. <http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/functional-analysis.html>