ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
STRUDEL: supporting trust in the dynamic establishment of peering coalitions
Full text PdfPdf (176 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Trust, recommendations, evidence, and other collaborative know-how (TRECK) table of contents
Pages: 1870 - 1874  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Authors
Daniele Quercia  University College London, London, UK
Manish Lad  University College London, London, UK
Stephen Hailes  University College London, London, UK
Licia Capra  University College London, London, UK
Saleem Bhatti  University College London, London, UK
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141719
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Coalition Peering Domain (CPD) is a recent innovation within the field of mesh networking. It facilitates the management of community-area networks in a distributed and scalable form, allowing devices to pool their network resources (particularly egress links) to the common good. However, as in P2P systems, this form of cooperative sharing architecture raises significant concerns about the effect of free-riders: nodes that utilise the bandwidth of others without providing an adequate return to the community. To address this problem, we propose STRUDEL, a distributed framework that tackles the problem of free-riders and consists of: (i) a mechanism for the detection of malicious peers; (ii) a formal Bayesian trust model, to assess peers' trustworthiness; (iii) a forwarding mechanism based on the maximisation of trust-informed utility.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Abdul-Rahman and S. Hailes. Using Recommendations for Managing Trust in Distributed Systems. In Proc. of IEEE Malaysia International Conference on Communication, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 1997.
 
2
 
3
T. Aura. Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA). In Proc. of the 6th LNCS International Conference on Information Security, pages 29--43, Bristol, UK, 2003.
 
4
S. Buchegger and J.-Y. L. Boudec. A robust reputation system for p2p and mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 2004.
 
5
M. Carbone, M. Nielsen, and V. Sassone. A Formal Model for Trust in Dynamic Networks. In Proc. of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, pages 54--63, Brisbane, Australia, September 2003.
 
6
 
7
N. Easen. Welcome to the Wi-Fi revolution. In http://edition.cnn.com/, September 2003.
 
8
G. Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162:1243--1248, December 1968.
 
9
M. Lad, S. Bhatti, S. Hailes, and P. Kirstein. Enabling Coalition-Based Community Networking. In Proc. of the London Communications Symposium, London, UK, September 2005.
 
10
M. Lad, S. Bhatti, P. Kirstein, and S. Hailes. Challenges, Opportunities and Incentives for Coalition-Based Community Networking. In Technical Research Note Number RN/05/08. University College London, London, UK, June 2005.
 
11
S. Marsh. Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling, 1994.
 
12
L. Mui, M. Mohtsahemi, C. Ang, P. Szolovits, and A. Halberstadt. Ratings in Distributed Systems: A Bayesian Approach. In Proc. of the 11th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 2001.
 
13
D. Quercia and S. Hailes. Risk Aware Decision Framework for Trusted Mobile Interactions. In Proc. of the 1st IEEE/CreateNet International Workshop on The Value of Security through Collaboration, Athens, Greece, September 2005.
 
14
P.-W. Yau and C. J. Mitchell. 2HARP: A secure routing protocol to detect failed and selfish nodes in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. of the 5th World Wireless Congress, pages 1--6, San Franciso, USA, 2004.
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniele Quercia: colleagues
Manish Lad: colleagues
Stephen Hailes: colleagues
Licia Capra: colleagues
Saleem Bhatti: colleagues