ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Trust-enhanced visibility for personalized document recommendations
Full text PdfPdf (202 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Trust, recommendations, evidence, and other collaborative know-how (TRECK) table of contents
Pages: 1865 - 1869  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Authors
Claudia Hess  Bamberg University, Germany
Klaus Stein  Bamberg University, Germany
Christoph Schlieder  Bamberg University, Germany
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141718
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Documents are recommended by computer-based systems normally according to their prominence in the document reference network. Based on the requirements identified in a concrete use case for recommending scientific publications, the paper claims that merely measuring prominence is insufficient for high quality recommendations. We propose to use information from a trust network in addition to the document network in order to improve and to personalize recommendations. A trust-enhanced visibility measure integrates trust information and the classical reference based measures. A simulation study applies the new visibility measure to the presented use case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
A.-L. Barabási. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. PLUME, 2003.
 
3
 
4
 
5
J. Golbeck, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler. Trust networks on the semantic web. In Proceedings of Cooperative Intelligent Agents, Helsinki, Finland, August 2003.
6
 
7
M. Kinateder and K. Rothermel. Architecture and algorithms for a distributed reputation system. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Trust Management, volume 2692, pages 1--16. Springer Verlag, April 2003.
8
 
9
T. Malsch and C. Schlieder. Communication without agents? From agent-oriented to communication-oriented modeling. In L. et al., editor, Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems: First International Workshop, RASTA 2002, pages 113--133, Bologna, Italy, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
 
10
F. Menczer. Growing and navigating the small world web by local content. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, volume 99, pages 14014--14019, 2002.
 
11
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45:167--256, 2003.
 
12
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
 
13
G. Pinski and F. Narin. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12:297--312, 1976.
 
14
M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos. Trust management for the semantic web. In D. Fensel, K. P. Sycara, and J. Mylopoulos, editors, Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003), volume 2870 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 351--368, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 2003. Springer Verlag.
 
15
D. J. Watts. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2003.
 
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
Claudia Hess: colleagues
Klaus Stein: colleagues
Christoph Schlieder: colleagues