Supporting change request assignment in open source development

ABSTRACT

Software repositories, such as CVS and Bugzilla, provide a huge amount of data regarding, respectively, source code and change request history. In this paper we propose a study on how change requests have been assigned to developers involved in an open source project and a method to suggest the set of best candidate developers to resolve a new change request. The method is based on the hypothesis that, given a new change request, developers that have resolved similar change requests in the past are the best candidates to resolve the new one. The suggestion can be useful for project managers in order to choose the best candidate to resolve a particular change request and/or to construct a competence database of developers working on software projects. We use the textual description of change requests stored in software repositories to index developers as documents in an information retrieval system. An Information Retrieval method is then applied to retrieve the candidate developers using the textual description of a new change request as a query.Case and evaluation study of the analysis and the methods introduced in this paper has been conducted on two large open source projects, Mozilla and KDE.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bugzilla. http://www.bugzilla.org/.
• 2: Cvs. http://www.cvshome.org/.
• 3: L. A. J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16:317--323, 1926.
• 4: A. Bookstein. Informetric distributions, part i: unified overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5):368--375, 1990.
• 5: A. Bookstein, Implications of ambiguity for scientometric measurement, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.52 n.1, p.74-79, Jan. 2001 [doi>10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<74::AID-ASI1052>3.3.CO;2-3]
• 6: Fabio Crestani , Mounia Lalmas , Cornelis J. Van Rijsbergen , Iain Campbell, “Is this document relevant?…probably”: a survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.30 n.4, p.528-552, Dec. 1998 [doi>10.1145/299917.299920]
• 7: Stephen G. Eick , Todd L. Graves , Alan F. Karr , J. S. Marron , Audris Mockus, Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.27 n.1, p.1-12, January 2001 [doi>10.1109/32.895984]
• 8: Michael Fischer , Martin Pinzger , Harald Gall, Populating a Release History Database from Version Control and Bug Tracking Systems, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, p.23, September 22-26, 2003
• 9: Karl Franz Fogel , Moshe Bar, Open Source Development with Cvs, Coriolis Group Books, Scottsdale, AZ, 2001
• 10: Todd L. Graves , Alan F. Karr , J. S. Marron , Harvey Siy, Predicting Fault Incidence Using Software Change History, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.26 n.7, p.653-661, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/32.859533]
• 11: K. Sparck Jones , S. Walker , S. E. Robertson, A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.36 n.6, p.779-808, Nov.06.2000 [doi>10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00015-7]
• 12: Thomas Kistler , Hannes Marais, WebL - a programming language for the Web, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, v.30 n.1-7, p.259-270, April 1, 1998
• 13: H. P. Luhn. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2:159--165, 1958.
• 14: Amir Michail, Data mining library reuse patterns using generalized association rules, Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, p.167-176, June 04-11, 2000, Limerick, Ireland [doi>10.1145/337180.337200]
• 15: Gregory B. Newby , Jane Greenberg , Paul Jones, Open source software development and Lotka's law: bibliometric patterns in programming, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.54 n.2, p.169-178, January 2003 [doi>10.1002/asi.10177]
• 16: I. Ounis, G. Amati, V. Plachouras, B. He, C. Macdonald, and D. Johnson. Terrier information retrieval platform. In ECIR, pages 517--519, 2005.
• 17: M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. 1997.
• 18: Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates , Berthier Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 19: Annie T. T. Ying , Gail C. Murphy , Raymond Ng , Mark C. Chu-Carroll, Predicting Source Code Changes by Mining Change History, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.30 n.9, p.574-586, September 2004 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2004.52]
• 20: G. K. Zipf. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 15:1--95, 1929.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management

Keywords:
information retrieval, maintenance task assignment, mining software repositories