ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions
Full text PdfPdf (159 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Semantic-based resource discovery, retrieval and composition (RDRC) table of contents
Pages: 1695 - 1699  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Authors
Claudia d'Amato  Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
Nicola Fanizzi  Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
Floriana Esposito  Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141677
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work presents a dissimilarity measure for Description Logics that are the theoretical counterpart of the standard representations for ontological knowledge. The focus is on the definition of a dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions, based both on the syntax and on the semantics of the descriptions. An extension of the measure is proposed for involving individuals and then for evaluating their dissimilarity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P., Eds. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
 
2
 
3
Bock., H. Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
 
4
Borgida, A., Walsh, T., and Hirsh, H. Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In Working Notes of the International Description Logics Workshop (Edinburgh, UK, 2005), CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
5
 
6
Cohen, W., and Hirsh, H. Learning the CLASSIC description logic. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1994), P. Torasso, J. Doyle, and E. Sandewall, Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 121--133.
 
7
d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., and Esposito, F. A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale (CILC05) (Rome, Italy, 2005), A. Pettorossi, Ed.
 
8
Donini, F. M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., and Schaerf, A. Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. Journal of Logic and Computation 4, 4 (1994), 423--452.
 
9
 
10
Resnik, P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 (1999), 95--130.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Shvaiko, P., and Euzenat, J. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics IV (2005), 146--171.
 
15
Tversky, A. Features od similarity. Psycological Review 84, 4 (1997), 327--352.
 
16
Weinstein, P., and Bimingham, P. Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. In Proceedings of 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, Management (1999).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Claudia d'Amato: colleagues
Nicola Fanizzi: colleagues
Floriana Esposito: colleagues