ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Study of the usefulness of known and new implicit indicators and their optimal combination for accurate inference of users interests
Full text PdfPdf (144 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Poster papers table of contents
Pages: 1118 - 1119  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Authors
Bracha Shapira  Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Meirav Taieb-Maimon  Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Anny Moskowitz  Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141542
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Explicit relevance feedback involves explicit ratings of documents or terms by users and disrupts their browsing and searching. The alternative non-disruptive method is implicit feedback inferring users' needs and interests by monitoring their regular interaction with the system. Some implicit indicators of interest, such as reading time, have been investigated in previous studies and were found indicative to the relevance of documents but not sufficiently accurate [1,2,3,4]. In this paper we present and examine several new relative implicit feedback indicators, and study the effect of combining several implicit indicators. The paper describes a large-scale user study on which users' searches were observed by a specially developed browser that recorded their behavior (implicit indicators) as well as their explicit ratings. We analyzed the relationship between implicit indicators and explicit ratings and found that a certain combination of implicit indicators achieved higher correlation with the explicit ratings than any of the individual indicators. We have also found that the relative indicators are more indicative to the level of interest of a user item than the non-relative indicators.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Oard, D. W., and Kim., J., Implicit feedback for recommender systems. In proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems. 1998
 
4
Oard, D. W., and Kim, J. Modeling information content using observable behavior. In proceeding of the 64th Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, USA, 38--45. 2001.
 
5
Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley & Sons, Inc. (ed). 2001.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bracha Shapira: colleagues
Meirav Taieb-Maimon: colleagues
Anny Moskowitz: colleagues