ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of the SET e-commerce protocol using a true concurrency process algebra
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Electronic commerce technologies (ECT) table of contents
Pages: 879 - 886  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Authors
M. Carmen Ruiz  Univ. de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
Diego Cazorla  Univ. de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
Fernando Cuartero  Univ. de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
Juan J. Pardo  Univ. de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141480
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A formal specification of the purchase phase in the SET protocol (Secure Electronic Transaction), an e-commerce protocol by Visa and MasterCard, is presented. It is modelled by means of a True Concurrency Timed Process Algebra called BTC which takes into account that the (limited amount of) available resources in a system have to be shared by all the processes. We have considered heterogeneous resources and we extend the algebra with the intention of representing the actions which use the shared resources and how many resources of each type the system has at its disposal.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Bella, F. Massacci, and L. C. Paulson. Verifying the SET registration protocols. In Proceedings of IEEE J. of Selected Areas in Communications, pages 21(1):77--87, 2003.
 
3
 
4
Mikael Buchholtz, Jacob Andersen, and Hans Henrik Løvengreen. Towards a Process Algebra for Shared Processors. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 52, 2002.
 
5
 
6
 
7
A. O. Freier, P. Karlton, and P. C. Kocher. The SSL protocol v3.0. Internet Draft, 1996.
 
8
A. Giacalone, C.-C. Jou, and S. A. Smolka. Algebraic reasoning for probabilistic concurrent systems. In Proceedings of Working Conference on Programming Concepts and Methods, IFIP TC 2, Sea of Galilee, Israel, 1990.
 
9
Damas P. Gruska. Process Algebra for Limited Parallelism. In Proc. of Concurrency, Specification and Programming (CS&P'96), pages 61--74, 1996.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
I. Lee, P. Brémond-Grégoire, and R. Gerber. A process algebraic approach to the specification and analysis of resource-bound real-time systems, 1994.
 
15
Mastercard and VISA. SET Secure Electronic Transaction Specification. http://www.setco.org/set_specifications.html, 1997.
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
M. C. Ruiz, D. Cazorla, F. Cuartero, J. J. Pardo, and H. Macia. A bounded true concurrency process algebra for performance evaluation. In Proc. of the 1st European Performance Engineering Workshop (EPEW'04), LNCS 3236, pages 143--155, Toledo, Spain, October 2004. Springer.
 
20
 
21
 
22
D. H. Steves, C. Edmondson-Yurkanan, and M. Gouda. A protocol for secure transactions. In Proceedings of the Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce., pages 201--212, 1996.


Collaborative Colleagues:
M. Carmen Ruiz: colleagues
Diego Cazorla: colleagues
Fernando Cuartero: colleagues
Juan J. Pardo: colleagues