|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Modern database applications like geographic information systems, multimedia databases, and digital libraries dealing with huge volumes of high dimensional data, make use of multidimensional index structures. Among them, SR-tree has been shown to outperform the R-Tree and its variants and the SS-Tree. For static datasets, packed index structures provide better retrieval performance. This paper presents schemes for SR-Tree packing based on different pre-processing techniques. The results show that these schemes consistently outperform packed R-Tree and conventional SR-Tree structures in terms of storage space and query performance. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||