ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Partially overlapped channels not considered harmful
Full text PdfPdf (227 KB)
Source Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems archive
Proceedings of the joint international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems table of contents
Saint Malo, France
SESSION: Wireless networks table of contents
Pages: 63 - 74  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-319-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Arunesh Mishra  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Vivek Shrivastava  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Suman Banerjee  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
William Arbaugh  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 37,   Downloads (12 Months): 298,   Citation Count: 15
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1140277.1140286
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many wireless channels in different technologies are known to have partial overlap. However, due to the interference effects among such partially overlapped channels, their simultaneous use has typically been avoided. In this paper, we present a first attempt to model partial overlap between channels in a systematic manner. Through the model, we illustrate that the use of partially overlapped channels is not always harmful. In fact, a careful use of some partially overlapped channels can often lead to significant improvements in spectrum utilization and application performance. We demonstrate this through analysis as well as through detailed application-level and MAC-level measurements. Additionally, we illustrate the benefits of our developed model by using it to directly enhance the performance of two previously proposed channel assignment algorithms --- one in the context of wireless LANs and the other in the context of multi-hop wireless mesh networks. Through detailed simulations, we show that use of partially overlapped channels in both these cases can improve end-to-end application throughput by factors between 1.6 and 2.7 in different scenarios, depending on wireless node density. We conclude by observing that the notion of partial overlap can be the right model of flexibility to design efficient channel access mechanisms in the emerging software radio platforms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Pradeep Kyasanur and Nitin Vaidya, "Routing and interface assignment in multi-channel multi-interface wireless networks," in IEEE WCNC, 2004.
 
2
Jungmin So and Nitin Vaidya, "Routing and channel assignment in multi-channel multi-hop wireless networks with single network interface," Technical Report, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 2005.
3
 
4
Ashish Raniwala and Tzi cker Chiueh, "Architecture and algorithms for an ieee 802.11-based multi-channel wireless mesh network," in IEEE Infocom, 2005.
 
5
Pradeep Kyasanur and Nitin Vaidya, "Capacity of multi-channel wireless networks: Impact of number of channels and interfaces," in ACM MobiCom, 2005.
6
7
 
8
A. Mishra, S. Banerjee, and W. Arbaugh, "Weighted coloring based channel assignment for wlans," MC2R, 2005.
 
9
 
10
E. G. Villegas, R. V. Ferr, and J. P. Aspas, "New algorithm for distributed frequency assignments in ieee 802.11," in European Wireless, 2005.
 
11
Eduard Garcia Villegas, Rafael Vidal Ferr, and Josep Paradells Aspas, "Implementation of a distributed dynamic channel assignment mechanism for ieee 802.11 networks," in Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC, 2005.
 
12
I. Katzela and M. Naghsineh, "Channel assignment schemes for cellular mobile telecommunication systems: A comprehensive survey," IEEE Personal Communications, June 1996.
13
 
14
A. Baiocchi, N. P. Magnani, V. Palestini, and F. Sestini, "Application of dynamic channel allocation strategies to the gsm cellular network," IEEE JSAC, vol. 15, Oct. 1997.
 
15
B. Krishnamachari, S. Wicker, R. Bejar, and C. Fernandez, "On the complexity of distributed self-configuration in wireless networks," Journal of Telecommunication Systems, 2003.
 
16
 
17
W. K. Lai and G. G. Coghill, "Channel assignment through evolutionary optimization," IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, Feb. 1996.
 
18
A. Mishra, E. Rozner, S. Banerjee, and W. Arbaugh, "Exploiting partially overlapping channels in wireless networks: Turning a peril into an advantage," in ACM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conference, 2005.
 
19
 
20
Kaixin Xu, Mario Gerla, and Sang Bae, "How effective is ieee 802.11 rts/cts handshake in ad hoc networks?," in IEEE GLOBECOM, November 2002.
 
21
"Enterasys roamabout wireless high-rate pc card," http://www.enterasys.com.
 
22
A. Mishra, V. Brik, S. Banerjee, A. Srinivasan, and W. Arbaugh, "A client-driven approach for channel management in wireless lans," in IEEE Infocom, 2006.
 
23
Jim Geier, "Assigning 802.11b access point channels," Wi-Fi Planet, 2004.
24
 
25
P. Gupta and P.R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, 2000.
26

CITED BY  15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Arunesh Mishra: colleagues
Vivek Shrivastava: colleagues
Suman Banerjee: colleagues
William Arbaugh: colleagues